In December 2022, Florida governor Ron DeSantis petitioned for a grand jury to investigate the unresolved issues at the heart of America’s covid response. The grand jury started its investigation in June 2023 and last week released its preliminary report in this 33-page document I’ll go over now.
The report starts with a little history of the grand jury and it’s limitations — mainly that the entity can recommend changes but not enact them. (This leaves the heavy lifting to Florida’s legislature.) The document also stresses the grand jury still has months and months of work left to do and this is by no means a complete account of the covid years.
The first screenshot-worthy section of the report lists some of the agencies who did NOT cooperate with the grand jury. You probably won’t be surprised to hear this list includes the CDC and the FDA.
That’s a huge red flag right there.
The report then dives into the definitions of “safe” and “effective”, noting that in the public health world, declaring something “safe” requires a calculation of initial risk. This step was completely ignored during the covid years when ‘experts’ said everybody was at risk — contrary to the actual science showing it was mostly the old and sick that were at risk of a serious covid case.
The grand jury then dives into the questions surrounding lockdown and mask mandates enforced by government, ultimately determining that ‘experts’ were actually going against the data we had at the time (I wrote about that here), as well as basically all pre-covid pandemic procedures.
In short, this was not an “information” problem, it was a “judgment” problem.
From its review, the grand jury determined that lockdowns in America were likely based on Chinese data, which was always laughably fake. Although the report doesn’t get into the origins of covid, I’m hopeful the grand jury will cover this in a future report, as I believe it will explain much of the response from the ‘experts’.
The report goes on to mention that by the time we knew was covid was, it had been spreading for weeks if not months:
(Reminder that by April 2020, 25% of NYC had antibodies. That’s millions of ‘missed’ cases right there.)
The report goes on to mention what was obvious to many of us in March 2020: lockdowns would lead to missed routine healthcare, with the effect getting worse as time passes:
But if you mentioned this in 2020, the ‘experts’ wanted you kicked out of the conversation.
The grand jury goes on to state that ‘experts’ have been conflating mental health issues caused by covid to mental health issues caused by the dramatic restructuring of American life:
In the final analysis of lockdowns, the report states:
It is clear to this Grand Jury that whatever benefits inured from these mandates, they were not worth the price.
The focus of the report then shifts to masks, with the grand jury highlighting the incredibly weak science used to justify the mask mandates. (Including the hair dresser ‘study’ and the laughably irrelevant Kansas ‘study’.) These studies were used to ‘justify’ not performing randomized controlled trials, even though they had little correlation with the real world.
I’m with the grand jury on this one — the CDC didn’t look because they knew what they would find. (There are more than a few examples from the last couple years!)
The report continues:
And this was obvious when watching real people wear their masks in the real world — they were CONSTANTLY fiddling with their masks, readjusting them, pulling them down to cough……and then going back to playing on their (dirty) smartphones.
The grand jury then dives into aerosol spread, which was only briefly mentioned (and then erased) by the ‘experts’, and how it meant masks and social distancing were irrelevant:
But ultimately, the ‘experts’ never tackled aerosol spread for the same reason they didn’t do RCTs on masking: They knew what they would find — there was no justification for masks OR social distancing.
The report concludes with the statement that the ‘experts’ weren’t actually “Following the Science” when demanding masks, lockdowns, and other NPIs, and in fact those ‘experts’ often attacked the people who knew the data. (I feel so seen right now!)
Ultimately, this report is why I’m not worried that Ron DeSantis won’t be able to get covid justice as president in 2024 — he can still blow the entire thing wide open in Florida.
I’m looking forward to the next report from the grand jury, and will share it when it drops!
I can’t publish this without acknowledging the most embarrassing political defeat of my lifetime: In Nevada, Nikki Haley loses (by 30%!!!) to “None of these candidates.”
Now to be fair, this primary doesn’t award any delegates — that occurs in next week’s caucuses — so it’s not like Haley lost a meaningful contest. But losing to nobody is embarrassing. Like, really really embarrassing. So embarrassing that you need to come up with an excuse — and you’ll NEVER BELIEVE what Haley’s excuse is……
Finally, the DOJ has determined that Joe Biden willfully took classified material, but won’t charge him because he’s an old man with a poor memory. No, really.
It’s enough to make you scream!
Not looking for a long-term thing? Tip me on Ko-fi — no subscription required!
Editing to add a link to Tucker’s just-released interview with Vladimir Putin:
The full text of the Biden special counsel report is available here:
https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/02/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf
Additionally, the post has been edited with the link to the Carlson/Putin interview:
https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/
Wow, I watched the news at around 2:40 this morning. Biden should be placed on the Poseidon at the appropriate moment. That man could not greet someone at (Walmart) and he is in charge of anything I’m involved with ? I’ll say it again…….wow!!!