Remember just a few days ago when I discussed the need to remember the FBI’s recent history when considering the case of 1/6? According to a motion made by David W. Fischer (attorney for Thomas E. Caldwell), over 20 federal assets were on the ground when protestors entered the capitol.
What was prevented from happening that day was many hours of debate on the legitimacy of electoral delegates from at least 6 states. That would have been broadcast to the public. MSM had already been suppressing this information for months with the phrase "baseless allegations" and not looking any further.
Who benefited? Many were expecting some type of event somewhere that would prevent debate on the legitimacy of the electoral delegates from several states. It doesn't take a conspiracy theorist to see what happened. There is already enough information that agent provocateurs were involved. There most certainly was an insurection that day but not the one that MSM reported.
I remember a passage from an old book about three swedish men accidentally trapped in Russia during the revolution. As they had lost all papers, they were held by the NKVD (or whatever the tsarist secret police was called). In one scene, the commissar gets a telegram and a package: a flat box. Inside the package is a picture of Lenin.
The commissar then replaces the portrait of the tsar with the one of Lenin, and continus interrogating the men, switching almost mid-sentence from accusing them of espionage against tsarist Russia for the benefit of the bolsjeviks, to espionage for tsarist-counterrevolutionaires.
If you understand that commissar and that scene, you understand all you need about secret services and secret police.
And knows exactly what room that switch is in and where that switch is? And the guy in front of the doors knows that person is in that room (which would presumably be guarded)?
Occum's razor.
Edit: But even IF that were the case, the opening of the doors isn't where the controversy ends. The crowd is still being held back until "they" talk to the officer on the scene.
Usually magnetic locks are released from inside by sensors allowing for an escape route. Nominally doors fail open, but these might have special overrides to fail closed. As you note that override switch was triggered by someone. I don't expect the J6 committee to be interested, not their political purpose, but the real investigations need to get a story for us to explain.
I still suspect that multiple factions are at work perhaps without any coordination to turn a crowd into a mob into a riot. IMHO, this all could have been stopped had Pence appeared in public to address the crowd. What did he know and when did he know it? But Nancy's security people ignored a lot of stuff, why?
They're desperate. They know they won't have any power after November, and need some wins quickly to hold together what little of their base remains. If pubs are even moderately competent, they'll take full advantage of the perfidy. If November is anything less than a full scale rout, the pubs failed. If they succeed, that might introduce a new set of problems, so we the people will need to become more attentive to our rulers either way.
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
What was prevented from happening that day was many hours of debate on the legitimacy of electoral delegates from at least 6 states. That would have been broadcast to the public. MSM had already been suppressing this information for months with the phrase "baseless allegations" and not looking any further.
Who benefited? Many were expecting some type of event somewhere that would prevent debate on the legitimacy of the electoral delegates from several states. It doesn't take a conspiracy theorist to see what happened. There is already enough information that agent provocateurs were involved. There most certainly was an insurection that day but not the one that MSM reported.
I remember a passage from an old book about three swedish men accidentally trapped in Russia during the revolution. As they had lost all papers, they were held by the NKVD (or whatever the tsarist secret police was called). In one scene, the commissar gets a telegram and a package: a flat box. Inside the package is a picture of Lenin.
The commissar then replaces the portrait of the tsar with the one of Lenin, and continus interrogating the men, switching almost mid-sentence from accusing them of espionage against tsarist Russia for the benefit of the bolsjeviks, to espionage for tsarist-counterrevolutionaires.
If you understand that commissar and that scene, you understand all you need about secret services and secret police.
The doors thing is interesting. Maybe someone made it into the security room where the door controls are located and flipped the proper switch?
And knows exactly what room that switch is in and where that switch is? And the guy in front of the doors knows that person is in that room (which would presumably be guarded)?
Occum's razor.
Edit: But even IF that were the case, the opening of the doors isn't where the controversy ends. The crowd is still being held back until "they" talk to the officer on the scene.
Usually magnetic locks are released from inside by sensors allowing for an escape route. Nominally doors fail open, but these might have special overrides to fail closed. As you note that override switch was triggered by someone. I don't expect the J6 committee to be interested, not their political purpose, but the real investigations need to get a story for us to explain.
I still suspect that multiple factions are at work perhaps without any coordination to turn a crowd into a mob into a riot. IMHO, this all could have been stopped had Pence appeared in public to address the crowd. What did he know and when did he know it? But Nancy's security people ignored a lot of stuff, why?
Imagine the truth that will come out when Musk buys Twitter! It will be GLORIOUS!
The utter panic that prospect is causing to the control freaks only confirms for me that we have been living in an incredible lie for years.
An oligarchy, to be exact!
Sometimes there is no good side.
They're desperate. They know they won't have any power after November, and need some wins quickly to hold together what little of their base remains. If pubs are even moderately competent, they'll take full advantage of the perfidy. If November is anything less than a full scale rout, the pubs failed. If they succeed, that might introduce a new set of problems, so we the people will need to become more attentive to our rulers either way.
👍👍👍👍
I can't wait for the "I can't answer that" hearing.
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
Ayn Rand
I love her description of bureaucrats and politicians.
Looters and parasites.
Spot on.