Remember just a few days ago when I discussed the need to remember the FBI’s recent history when considering the case of 1/6? According to a motion made by David W. Fischer (attorney for Thomas E. Caldwell), over 20 federal assets were on the ground when protestors entered the capitol.
“At least 20 FBI and ATF assets were embedded around the Capitol on J6,” read a footnote on Page 6 of the motion. No other details were provided in the document.
The footnote said defense attorneys “combed through a mountain of discovery,” including FBI form 302 summaries of interviews conducted by FBI agents.
In addition to the information about law-enforcement assets on the ground at the Capitol, the footnote says, the Oath Keepers “were being monitored and recorded prior to J6.”
If the Oath Keepers were being monitored and recorded before 1/6, which is a near certainty, then everybody in all the alphabet agencies knew exactly what was coming that day in DC. The reason they didn’t have enough police on the ground is simple - they let it happen on purpose. (or possibly made it happen on purpose)
After being accused of stealing an election, the Democrats have acted exactly like people who have stole an election. The J6 commission is the same exact thing. If the Democrats DIDN’T set the whole thing up in order to provide an excuse for (normally) unconstitutional investigations, they are sure acting like they did.
The only possible solution to regain the trust of the people is to release ALL video evidence from 1/6. But my hunch is that the release of those videos would show the ‘conspiracy theorists’ to be right — again. At the very least, it would make The Swamp explain videos like this one:
What was prevented from happening that day was many hours of debate on the legitimacy of electoral delegates from at least 6 states. That would have been broadcast to the public. MSM had already been suppressing this information for months with the phrase "baseless allegations" and not looking any further.
Who benefited? Many were expecting some type of event somewhere that would prevent debate on the legitimacy of the electoral delegates from several states. It doesn't take a conspiracy theorist to see what happened. There is already enough information that agent provocateurs were involved. There most certainly was an insurection that day but not the one that MSM reported.
I remember a passage from an old book about three swedish men accidentally trapped in Russia during the revolution. As they had lost all papers, they were held by the NKVD (or whatever the tsarist secret police was called). In one scene, the commissar gets a telegram and a package: a flat box. Inside the package is a picture of Lenin.
The commissar then replaces the portrait of the tsar with the one of Lenin, and continus interrogating the men, switching almost mid-sentence from accusing them of espionage against tsarist Russia for the benefit of the bolsjeviks, to espionage for tsarist-counterrevolutionaires.
If you understand that commissar and that scene, you understand all you need about secret services and secret police.