One thing often missed about "placebo trials" is that they don't study "cured."
Placebos are, to be frank, controlled mysticism. A placebo effect only exists if the treatment used "did not cause the observed improvement." Cured is not tested. When any improvement (even a cure,) occurs on the placebo arm, it's simply ignored. It has to be ignored because - if an improvement is found to have a real cause (every real effect has a real cause), then it's not a "placebo effect," it's a "real effect.
In each of the trials, CURED was simply ignored. Over 600 million people have "RECOVERED " from COVID. Not one is, or has been "CURED." Why not. If there were an independent (of treatments used) test of CURED, it would soon become obvious that ivermectin CURES COVID. As long as they can limit the trials to the "Gold Standard " of double blind placebo controlled, they never have to worry about those pesky "cures" like Ivermectin.
I don't know if I had what they call "covid" in May of 2021, but I lost my sense of taste and smell for *weeks* (and it still hasn't recovered 100%), was dizzy, lost my appetite and a few other things. I figured I better try some Ivermectin (horse paste). My appetite returned within 24 hours of my first dose (I ate like a horse) and after my 5 day treatment with Ivermectin, not only did I feel way better, but I also noticed an ulcer that I had battled for literally 40 years had somehow disappeared. In fact, that ulcer is gone. I haven't felt it once in over a year now. Regardless of whether Ivermectin is an "effective" treatment for what they are calling "covid" no one can convince me that it didn't have a positive effect on me. And even if it was all in my imagination and somehow I experienced some kind of "placebo" effect, it was the best money I've ever spent on something medicinal in my life. Even if Ivermectin would not have been an option for me at all, I still would have exhausted *all* resources before even thinking about going to the hospital, getting "tested", or getting an experimental gene therapy injection. And this should have been *everyone's* choice. I demanded informed consent. And I got it because I went looking for it and didn't just blindly "trust the science".
These mechanisms have shown effect against RNA and even some DNA viruses, and will be very helpful under the threat of future virus manic episodes in the coming years.
Dec 14, 2022·edited Dec 14, 2022Liked by SimulationCommander
People were censored, and allowed themselves to be censored. They created private groups to talk amongst themselves (and not those that needed to hear it as well), and in those private groups spoke in code and emojis like eating carrots. And when those groups grew to 300,000, those private groups got shutdown. Now imagine what difference it would have made to instead have fought to not be censored and spoke freely to friends and family. Spoke in a forum where they could openly share their experiences whether positive, negative, or neutral. That's why I posted: https://leemuller.substack.com/p/people-rate-ivermectin-higher-than
What is there to say but this: what you report on is simply rational choice theory in action. Bill Gates makes rational choices based on his own maximum profit and gain from them, for the least possible risk.
He is not alone in doing so, in this or any other makro-scale affair when it comes to finance/economics/business and politics, though some of his ilk think it wise to coach their egotism in virtue and preach about the current thing.
Stuff like this is the one only and inevitable result of objectivist theory in practice. Without other morals, "I want to and I can so I did" becomes the norm, and the more powerful the person, the greater the effect on everyone else.
Stop expecting psychopaths to behave as if they have any compassion. They WANT us to DIE.
Okay, read it again.
Now let's get busy figuring out how to throw a giant fucking wrench into the gears and otherwise utterly ignore them and undo their whole damn thing by not participating.
There was an ivermectin subreddit, that was eventually deleted. However, thanks to some knowledgeable folks there, I was able to get ivermectin. On my 1st try, I got the first of three prescriptions through an app and filled by rite-aid. Right before the first refill, all major drug retailers stopped filling ivermectin prescriptions. Then, I was able to get it through another app and a pharmacy in FL. After that I just ordered online from another country. My husband got covid(?) this year. He followed the FLCCC protocols and was better in 4 days.
We have stocked up on other meds (natural and big pharma types). We don’t trust doctors, nor the system. We hope to eventually find an “off-grid” doctor, but for the moment, the internet will have to do. Luckily, eating low carb, real food (mostly meat) we don’t need to take any meds.
Everyone said Hydroxychoroquine was rejected because Trump endorsed it. I disagree. I think it was because when Trump mentioned it, it became well known. So they had to quash it. It was the publicity that Trump gave it, not that it was endorsed by Trump.
Ivermectin works, and the cover-up of this is the biggest crime in our history. The most obvious part of the scandal is the concerted efforts to lie about the safety profile of it.
Argue about efficacy all you want.
Efficacy is not relevant. Safety is. Ivermectin is safe. Super safe. And they all lied about it. The WHO had it listed as one of the safest drugs of all time. They lied. The press lied. The FDA Tweeted lies.
We challenge anyone to find someone calling Ivermectin “unsafe” prior to 2019. Nature magazine lauded over it in 2017.
So then explain Why? Why the massive colluding effort to spread a lie about it being unsafe??
Unless - Dear Watson - it actually works. That’s the only thing that makes sense here. Ivermectin working fits every puzzle piece together. And also reveals this crime of the century.
Even if Ivermectin only had 1% efficacy that would have been tens of thousands of lives saved. Now imagine that is actually 10% efficacy. Or 90%.
What they cannot deny is the safety. Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin. It’s almost as safe as a doctor recommending taking vitamins. We should have been handing it out like candy even if it was only a .0001% improvement rate. In many countries you can get Ivermectin over the counter. So why not just let people take it? Why demonize it’s safety profile?
We all know why. Say it. Be brave. Let the intellectual bravery of the doctors who risked everything to get the word out make you brave enough to say the truth now.
WE ARE BEING COLLUDED AGAINST.
But even worse, these same people are the people we are letting run our systems. We can’t do that. The systems that govern over our lives effect us more than anything. If you tell us what systems you live under (government, school, family, work, infrastructure, etc) we can accurately predict the quality of life you have. Systems are THAT important.
Our systems have been corrupted. We need to admit it. Then, we need to take responsibility and fix them. Is it our fault? No. But it damn sure is our responsibility to fix it..
Are you a problem solver?
This is a call to action. We need to decentralize. We need to relentlessly demand transparency in all systems that govern over us. We need to find better ways to collaborate with other highly aligned problems solvers like yourself.
Let us share an idea with you that could really solve a lot of our problems:
“Given as a tablet in mass drug administrations, oral ivermectin has been used extensively and safely for over two decades in many countries to treat filarial worm infections. Although not FDA-approved for the treatment of lice, ivermectin tablets given in a single oral dose of 200 micrograms/kg or 400 micrograms/kg repeated in 9-10 days has been shown effective against head lice.”
“It took a strange little trip to get here: while reading about Sam Bankman-Fried being arrested (the day before testifying before congress, because of course it was)...” <- the sarcasm is palpable here. Totally made me laugh out loud and after a stressful (the kind that blindsides you), I needed that laugh.
So, B&M Gates are thé primary finders, but didn’t the others along the body provide at least SOME funding?
One thing often missed about "placebo trials" is that they don't study "cured."
Placebos are, to be frank, controlled mysticism. A placebo effect only exists if the treatment used "did not cause the observed improvement." Cured is not tested. When any improvement (even a cure,) occurs on the placebo arm, it's simply ignored. It has to be ignored because - if an improvement is found to have a real cause (every real effect has a real cause), then it's not a "placebo effect," it's a "real effect.
In each of the trials, CURED was simply ignored. Over 600 million people have "RECOVERED " from COVID. Not one is, or has been "CURED." Why not. If there were an independent (of treatments used) test of CURED, it would soon become obvious that ivermectin CURES COVID. As long as they can limit the trials to the "Gold Standard " of double blind placebo controlled, they never have to worry about those pesky "cures" like Ivermectin.
To your health, Tracy
Author: A New Theory of Cure
It was notable that the SEC's press release on FTX yesterday cited Bankman-Fried's political contributions.
I found your "I'm sorry" cats relative.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/LoJnJyQyL4h57hbJ9
I don't know if I had what they call "covid" in May of 2021, but I lost my sense of taste and smell for *weeks* (and it still hasn't recovered 100%), was dizzy, lost my appetite and a few other things. I figured I better try some Ivermectin (horse paste). My appetite returned within 24 hours of my first dose (I ate like a horse) and after my 5 day treatment with Ivermectin, not only did I feel way better, but I also noticed an ulcer that I had battled for literally 40 years had somehow disappeared. In fact, that ulcer is gone. I haven't felt it once in over a year now. Regardless of whether Ivermectin is an "effective" treatment for what they are calling "covid" no one can convince me that it didn't have a positive effect on me. And even if it was all in my imagination and somehow I experienced some kind of "placebo" effect, it was the best money I've ever spent on something medicinal in my life. Even if Ivermectin would not have been an option for me at all, I still would have exhausted *all* resources before even thinking about going to the hospital, getting "tested", or getting an experimental gene therapy injection. And this should have been *everyone's* choice. I demanded informed consent. And I got it because I went looking for it and didn't just blindly "trust the science".
I believe I was the first to summarize the main mechanisms of action of ivermectin against COVID, in the 2nd half of this article, https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/ivermectin-is-safe-and-effective
And previously in my book The Defeat Of COVID.
These mechanisms have shown effect against RNA and even some DNA viruses, and will be very helpful under the threat of future virus manic episodes in the coming years.
People were censored, and allowed themselves to be censored. They created private groups to talk amongst themselves (and not those that needed to hear it as well), and in those private groups spoke in code and emojis like eating carrots. And when those groups grew to 300,000, those private groups got shutdown. Now imagine what difference it would have made to instead have fought to not be censored and spoke freely to friends and family. Spoke in a forum where they could openly share their experiences whether positive, negative, or neutral. That's why I posted: https://leemuller.substack.com/p/people-rate-ivermectin-higher-than
What is there to say but this: what you report on is simply rational choice theory in action. Bill Gates makes rational choices based on his own maximum profit and gain from them, for the least possible risk.
He is not alone in doing so, in this or any other makro-scale affair when it comes to finance/economics/business and politics, though some of his ilk think it wise to coach their egotism in virtue and preach about the current thing.
Stuff like this is the one only and inevitable result of objectivist theory in practice. Without other morals, "I want to and I can so I did" becomes the norm, and the more powerful the person, the greater the effect on everyone else.
Stop expecting psychopaths to behave as if they have any compassion. They WANT us to DIE.
Okay, read it again.
Now let's get busy figuring out how to throw a giant fucking wrench into the gears and otherwise utterly ignore them and undo their whole damn thing by not participating.
Arrest Bill Gates and slap Melinda in the face.
People Rate Ivermectin Higher than COVID-19 Vaccines
https://leemuller.substack.com/p/people-rate-ivermectin-higher-than
Compare ratings and submit your own review
There was an ivermectin subreddit, that was eventually deleted. However, thanks to some knowledgeable folks there, I was able to get ivermectin. On my 1st try, I got the first of three prescriptions through an app and filled by rite-aid. Right before the first refill, all major drug retailers stopped filling ivermectin prescriptions. Then, I was able to get it through another app and a pharmacy in FL. After that I just ordered online from another country. My husband got covid(?) this year. He followed the FLCCC protocols and was better in 4 days.
We have stocked up on other meds (natural and big pharma types). We don’t trust doctors, nor the system. We hope to eventually find an “off-grid” doctor, but for the moment, the internet will have to do. Luckily, eating low carb, real food (mostly meat) we don’t need to take any meds.
Everyone said Hydroxychoroquine was rejected because Trump endorsed it. I disagree. I think it was because when Trump mentioned it, it became well known. So they had to quash it. It was the publicity that Trump gave it, not that it was endorsed by Trump.
Ivermectin works, and the cover-up of this is the biggest crime in our history. The most obvious part of the scandal is the concerted efforts to lie about the safety profile of it.
Argue about efficacy all you want.
Efficacy is not relevant. Safety is. Ivermectin is safe. Super safe. And they all lied about it. The WHO had it listed as one of the safest drugs of all time. They lied. The press lied. The FDA Tweeted lies.
We challenge anyone to find someone calling Ivermectin “unsafe” prior to 2019. Nature magazine lauded over it in 2017.
So then explain Why? Why the massive colluding effort to spread a lie about it being unsafe??
Unless - Dear Watson - it actually works. That’s the only thing that makes sense here. Ivermectin working fits every puzzle piece together. And also reveals this crime of the century.
Even if Ivermectin only had 1% efficacy that would have been tens of thousands of lives saved. Now imagine that is actually 10% efficacy. Or 90%.
What they cannot deny is the safety. Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin. It’s almost as safe as a doctor recommending taking vitamins. We should have been handing it out like candy even if it was only a .0001% improvement rate. In many countries you can get Ivermectin over the counter. So why not just let people take it? Why demonize it’s safety profile?
We all know why. Say it. Be brave. Let the intellectual bravery of the doctors who risked everything to get the word out make you brave enough to say the truth now.
WE ARE BEING COLLUDED AGAINST.
But even worse, these same people are the people we are letting run our systems. We can’t do that. The systems that govern over our lives effect us more than anything. If you tell us what systems you live under (government, school, family, work, infrastructure, etc) we can accurately predict the quality of life you have. Systems are THAT important.
Our systems have been corrupted. We need to admit it. Then, we need to take responsibility and fix them. Is it our fault? No. But it damn sure is our responsibility to fix it..
Are you a problem solver?
This is a call to action. We need to decentralize. We need to relentlessly demand transparency in all systems that govern over us. We need to find better ways to collaborate with other highly aligned problems solvers like yourself.
Let us share an idea with you that could really solve a lot of our problems:
https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/why-doesnt-this-exist-building-a?r=7oa9d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I still can’t believe the CDC hasn’t modified its suggestions for Lice.
https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/lice/head/treatment.html
“Given as a tablet in mass drug administrations, oral ivermectin has been used extensively and safely for over two decades in many countries to treat filarial worm infections. Although not FDA-approved for the treatment of lice, ivermectin tablets given in a single oral dose of 200 micrograms/kg or 400 micrograms/kg repeated in 9-10 days has been shown effective against head lice.”
Dr. Peter McCullough for President! And simulation commander for VP?🤔
“It took a strange little trip to get here: while reading about Sam Bankman-Fried being arrested (the day before testifying before congress, because of course it was)...” <- the sarcasm is palpable here. Totally made me laugh out loud and after a stressful (the kind that blindsides you), I needed that laugh.
So, B&M Gates are thé primary finders, but didn’t the others along the body provide at least SOME funding?