An Unexpected Turn to.....Ivermectin?
Yeah, I dunno either.
I was planning on writing about The Twitter Files (again) today, but I feel like I haven’t done anything else the last week (which is dumb, because I have). So instead I’ll point you to Brad’s amazing Twitter Files de-roll of what has been released so far and will undoubtedly write about the story in the near future — it’s sort of my wheelhouse!
So today we’re taking a complete detour and talking about something I haven’t really mentioned much in the past because of my glaring deficiencies in the arena: ivermectin.
It took a strange little trip to get here: while reading about Sam Bankman-Fried being arrested (the day before testifying before congress, because of course it was), I started thinking about my two previous articles and the surprising finding that FTX didn’t “fund the trial that killed ivermectin” — although who actually did fund it is probably worse. (As before, you’ll probably have to enlarge here)
Yes. That’s THE Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Here’s the relevant section from my article on the subject:
From the start, a section of the population was extremely suspicious of this trial, namely because of the massive conflict of interest of the study’s backers (page 5). I’ve previously written about Bill Gates push into the vaccine industry and — wouldn’t you know it? — we find him in the middle of the Together Trial as well (along with Pfizer and anti-ivermectin FDA stooges).
Looking at the list of players surrounding the Together Trial, it’s a near certainty that the study was designed so ivermectin would ‘fail’ (leaving emergency authorizations in place) and to 're-enforce’ the need for more tests, faster vaccine development, and have treatments ‘ready in advance’ — all major long-term goals of the players involved.
You’ll probably remember that the Together Trial basically drove the nail into the coffin of Ivermectin as an ‘allowable’ option for covid 19. In an unprecedented (at that time) assault on freedom in the medical community, doctors were threatened (and still are!) if they dared utter the I word. (Yet the government continued to give Ivermectin to Afghani immigrants on the off chance they had a parasitic infection — subtly admitting the drug is perfectly safe for human consumption, unlike the FDA:)
Yet in the entire time that ivermectin’s ability to stop covid has been ‘debated’, I have heard exactly nobody explain to me how my hypothetical covid treatment is between anybody but me and my doctor. If we both agree that ivermectin is worth a shot, why does the paid-off FDA get to override that decision?
Of course, in America today the freedom-based argument rarely prevails, so we must look at other avenues to attack the problems we face. And today something occurred to me that I’m not sure I’ve seen mentioned in the Great Ivermectin Debate.
Going to the Together Trial publication site, I grabbed the first Ivermectin study listed. Here’s what we see (highlighting mine):
My question is very, very simple:
When a patient has had symptoms of covid for up to 7 days and has at least one risk factor for disease progression, do we give them a covid vaccine?
Of course not. In fact, we’ve allowed Big Pharma and the “experts” to claim that it takes roughly 40 days after you start the jab regimen before you’re ACTUALLY “vaccinated” (ensuring a fake 100% efficacy at the end of that 40 days). So by definition, the vaccine must be administered over a month in advance of contracting covid. (Which - you know - shouldn’t be a thing after getting a vaccine, but - you know.)
So the ‘experts’ are able to kill off possible treatments and threaten doctors who dare disobey BASED ON CASES IN WHICH THE VACCINE WOULD BE USELESS ANYWAY! If the vaccine gets the benefit of being administered OVER A MONTH IN ADVANCE, why does Ivermectin or [whatever other drug] not get that same benefit of the doubt?
Ivermectin works, and the cover-up of this is the biggest crime in our history. The most obvious part of the scandal is the concerted efforts to lie about the safety profile of it.
Argue about efficacy all you want.
Efficacy is not relevant. Safety is. Ivermectin is safe. Super safe. And they all lied about it. The WHO had it listed as one of the safest drugs of all time. They lied. The press lied. The FDA Tweeted lies.
We challenge anyone to find someone calling Ivermectin “unsafe” prior to 2019. Nature magazine lauded over it in 2017.
So then explain Why? Why the massive colluding effort to spread a lie about it being unsafe??
Unless - Dear Watson - it actually works. That’s the only thing that makes sense here. Ivermectin working fits every puzzle piece together. And also reveals this crime of the century.
Even if Ivermectin only had 1% efficacy that would have been tens of thousands of lives saved. Now imagine that is actually 10% efficacy. Or 90%.
What they cannot deny is the safety. Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin. It’s almost as safe as a doctor recommending taking vitamins. We should have been handing it out like candy even if it was only a .0001% improvement rate. In many countries you can get Ivermectin over the counter. So why not just let people take it? Why demonize it’s safety profile?
We all know why. Say it. Be brave. Let the intellectual bravery of the doctors who risked everything to get the word out make you brave enough to say the truth now.
WE ARE BEING COLLUDED AGAINST.
But even worse, these same people are the people we are letting run our systems. We can’t do that. The systems that govern over our lives effect us more than anything. If you tell us what systems you live under (government, school, family, work, infrastructure, etc) we can accurately predict the quality of life you have. Systems are THAT important.
Our systems have been corrupted. We need to admit it. Then, we need to take responsibility and fix them. Is it our fault? No. But it damn sure is our responsibility to fix it..
Are you a problem solver?
This is a call to action. We need to decentralize. We need to relentlessly demand transparency in all systems that govern over us. We need to find better ways to collaborate with other highly aligned problems solvers like yourself.
Let us share an idea with you that could really solve a lot of our problems:
https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/why-doesnt-this-exist-building-a?r=7oa9d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
There was an ivermectin subreddit, that was eventually deleted. However, thanks to some knowledgeable folks there, I was able to get ivermectin. On my 1st try, I got the first of three prescriptions through an app and filled by rite-aid. Right before the first refill, all major drug retailers stopped filling ivermectin prescriptions. Then, I was able to get it through another app and a pharmacy in FL. After that I just ordered online from another country. My husband got covid(?) this year. He followed the FLCCC protocols and was better in 4 days.
We have stocked up on other meds (natural and big pharma types). We don’t trust doctors, nor the system. We hope to eventually find an “off-grid” doctor, but for the moment, the internet will have to do. Luckily, eating low carb, real food (mostly meat) we don’t need to take any meds.