Great post. I believe the truest statement is about the real work now beginning. This isn't over by a long shot. Though there is a glimmer of light on the horizon, we have a long way to go. IMO, there is a lot of hardship coming in many ways. This is going to really test us and will truly separate the strong from the weak and the courageous from the cowards. We have s couple of generations who've never known a missed meal. Maybe I'll be wrong and everything will turn around and happy days will be here again...but I don't think so. And, actually, I don't want those happy days to magically reappear because it's going to take some hardship for us to find the good in ourselves and learn what really matters in life. There's more to life than a 70,000$ pickup, a 5 bedroom 3 bath home, a camper, a boat, a snowmobile (and the list goes on). Until we realize that material wealth is not the most important thing in life, I'm not sure things will ever turn around. But, again, maybe I'll be wrong. Thanks for this SC. Thought provoking.
The reason the covid insanity went on so long was that very few people were willing to pay any price whatsoever.
That will be the biggest challenge. The "good" news out of all the bad news is that millions of people did end up paying a price in the end - and now the country.
Sometimes pain has to show up to your front door in order to wake up.
Great strategy. Great essay. Couple things we need to consider more carefully.
The most startling observation has been the ease with which most of the world acquiesced to medical tyranny which produced the oppression. Human culture has changed. We now prefer safe spaces to independence, welfare to self reliance. We have become wards of the state, Marxists without the label. That ingrained indoctrination will be difficult to overcome. No matter how many lions rise up, most people will remain frightened and submissive, probably more so as conflict approaches. We're not lions to them, we're ultra Maga -- the enemy.
We must remember that there are degrees of civility. The approach most have taken is that of choir boys -- quiet, submissive, docile. A few become emotional, expressing outrage in emotional outbursts. Marching on the capitol led some to don bizarre costumes and violate standards of civility and law to express their dissatisfaction. How's that working? There is a big range of responses in between. Effective resistance needs to be firm and businesslike, clearly expressing demands with only enough emotion to signal to the oppressors that we're ready to escalate as needed. That's a learned skill that few have mastered, and most don't want to. Whining or screaming are their only options. We need to wear passive aggression like a badge. Fuck with the bull and you'll get the horns. Be the bulls, not cows.
Modern societies everywhere suffer from an excess of civility, instilled by our masters who need to suppress our independence to maintain their control. That will take time to overcome, requiring retraining for most of the population, indoctrinated in woke political correctness for several generations. But it can be accelerated by ever present examples, and constant reminders that tyranny will be opposed. Lions are not feared because they're big and strong, but because they might decide to eat you.
I heard a story recently of a US senator, don't recall who nor the circumstances, who said our problems are all because we stopped kicking asses. That's the only way to reverse our slide into Marxist oblivion.
As the Marines say, be polite and diplomatic, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
Aristotle’s Politics: there’s a passage in it that discusses the isolation and atomization of the citizenry. I’m pasting it in below, with a link to a translation that's on an MIT website:
Such are the notes of the tyrant and the arts by which he preserves his power; there is no wickedness too great for him. All that we have said may be summed up under three heads, which answer to the three aims of the tyrant. These are, (1) the humiliation of his subjects; he knows that a mean-spirited man will not conspire against anybody; (2) the creation of mistrust among them; for a tyrant is not overthrown until men begin to have confidence in one another; and this is the reason why tyrants are at war with the good; they are under the idea that their power is endangered by them, not only because they would not be ruled despotically but also because they are loyal to one another, and to other men, and do not inform against one another or against other men; (3) the tyrant desires that his subjects shall be incapable of action, for no one attempts what is impossible, and they will not attempt to overthrow a tyranny, if they are powerless. Under these three heads the whole policy of a tyrant may be summed up, and to one or other of them all his ideas may be referred: (1) he sows distrust among his subjects; (2) he takes away their power; (3) he humbles them.
The pre-Enlightenment writers on government (Shakespeare, Aristotle, etc.) are very sharp about tyranny. It fits with how brutal and direct their governments were.
I thought it was not coincidental that independent, privately owned restaurants were a particular target of lockdowns, one of hardest-hit sectors. Many were forced out of business. They represent a natural, anonymous meeting place for like-minded people to discuss ideas.
Ayn Rand observed that totalitarian plans rely on the sanction of their victims to keep themselves in business. There has been much discussion about boycotts of various businesses, but it seems like we haven’t gotten serious about withdrawing support from those who are promoting this. Lots of talk, but public schools are convenient, as are Amazon and Netflix. We need to get serious about eschewing convenience and withdrawing financial support. Although I do wonder when I believe most have withdrawn from MSM, and that still seems to be going strong...
Wonderful article. I had no idea about Kanye West being "de-banked," which is disturbing to say the least. I suppose it was because he espoused "anti-semitic" tropes, meaning he espoused the beliefs of the Black Hebrew Israelites, a group that's been around for nearly 150 years. Or maybe he said "White Lives Matter." Someone needs to make a shirt: "No lives matter (to us), sincerely, your government."
Fortunately I live in a more conservative area (and that I feel fortunate about that shows how times have changed). I've been threatening for a while to get a sign for my lawn that reads, "Virtue signaling and meaningless slogans have no home here." Maybe it's time.
I want to respond to your article, to join the conversation, but my multitude of thoughts are a jumble, so please bear with me.
It’s been nearly a year since Inslee’s mandate meant the Edmonds School District could “terminate” me, even though I was a highly sought-after substitute teacher with a stellar reputation. Inslee has had emergency powers for nearly 1000 days, but here in WA, few seem to know that a mandate is still in place. The only unvaxxed people I know in WA are my husband and 2 of our 6 adult children. It’s a lonely place to live. All of my friends and extended family have taken some numbers of injections. I have had conversations that have risked friendships and at this point, I don’t know how to walk that line with people who clearly are NOT going to see things the way we do. My job loss was a “choice” I made (in their view).
Here’s what I want: the district to restore my job (without me having to jump through any hoops) and the wages I have lost this past year. But I don’t even know who else got terminated or how to find out. I don’t know how to get that information so we can band together.
I pray a lot, especially that truth will be revealed, and that those I love will have their eyes opened while being protected from harm. I worry about them just as much as they worry about my unvaccinated self. So sad, really.
Lastly, there is a great resource for having conversations at reachingpeople.net. It’s where I have learned to understand why reaching those I love with the truth has been so difficult, and how to temper my words so that I can convey them with calmness for greater impact. I don’t get these opportunities often, but it’s good to be prepared.
You're exactly the type of 'Group 1' person that we need to know about so we can support you! Many of us here are in Washington, and I bet that at least some of us are in your area! That's the makings of a local support network!
You need to get a new government for that to happen. Join and become active in political groups that most closely match your thoughts. This is war, and victory won't come from hope, but from action.
I agree with everything you said. And not to be pessimistic, but we do need a realistic understanding of what we’re up against. We have been almost checkmated from the very beginning of the Spectacle. As acknowledged, none of us own any part of our mass communication infrastructure and if things ever got bad enough for TPTB, I can see someone pulling the plug entirely. That is why physical connections are important, but that applies in so many other ways. I’m not sure if we can take control of the wheel before someone hits the self-destruct or even if we’d want to. And again, it goes way beyond communication… when the lettuce you buy in Maine all comes from Arizona, you have a looming problem.
That’s why I feel there is a two pronged counter that needs to be adopted: fighting against the organized technocratic fascist state before we’re all in pens that we can’t escape from and developing self-sustainable, small communities as breakaway civilizations, so to speak. I’ve realized though that while the pieces have been obviously moved over the last few decades to achieving the former, there has been nearly as much work put in to prevent the latter by labeling movements as cults, militias, domestic terrorists, etc. We can only succeed by doing both things, simultaneously and strategically, with great intelligence and planning.
When viewed through the lens of history, I cannot arrive at any other conclusion that to go forward, we must “get small.” Massive civilization is always doomed to failure because of the nature of human beings… one sociopath in a group of a 1,000 can be stopped, that same rate in a country of millions will end up with the cover of personal anonymity to rise to the top. Again, this is where the Spectacle works for them, by creating a mask of public persona. As long as that apparatus exists, I see no end to corruption and authoritarian control. We must stop dealing with avatars and start dealing with people.
It is not hopeless, but it is a lifetime of work. Maybe many lifetimes, but I cannot think of a more worthy cause.
Oho ho ho! Liberal moslems are generally more conservative and traditional than conservative christians, so that's just business as normal. For what the average moslem thinks you can check out World Value Survey-reports, not the graphs but the actual reports, and the Arab Youth Survey; both are freely available online.
In those you'll find such things as virtually all moslems thinks homoseuxality is a criminal act which should mean prison, at least for a first offence, and anywhere between 40% and 95% depending on nation and age bracket thinks it deserves execution - and those aren't the extremists, those are the normal average Mohameds and Youssufs and Aishas. The extremists are the guys calling for public floggings for whistling - which is not a joke, by the way.
Anyway, good post! If you take suggestions, here's one from me, seeing as I was a "radical activist" in my youth though that label wasn't in use then:
Agree to stick to one issue in one group.
If you meet up with nineteen others to organise protests against a local school board trying to normalise pedophilia via the LGBTPQ-agenda, stick with that and make sure all agree to sticking with that - even if you might have a hobby horse regarding open carry, and Elsa might be into getting a vegan food option for school lunch and Jody wants the school to run a mini-farm for teaching OTG eco-living and so on - stick with the one issue you are united on.
Another thing: be aware that when journos come sniffing like dogs after a bitch in heat, they always have an agenda (yeah, I know you know but it benefits us all seeing it repeated) and they will try to use questions to sow dissent among you:
"You John Jones is a local very succesful business-owner, having taken over your father's multi-million dollar business a few years back, and Jill Jilligan here you worked your way up from being homeless to having your own food van - who would you say have had to work the hardest at success, seeing as you are both protesting proposition T34/75 on 'Equity and resource equality in the educational environment'?"
Questions like that are meant to entrap, and get you to show dissent and to start you fighting each-other, in front of potential sympathisers. Any time a journalist or other person starts their question with a long preamble, they are setting this kind of trap. Cut them off, politely and apologetically:
"Please, if you could just ask your question? As you see, there are many others here who also have questions to ask and I'm afraid it would be most unfair to let you monopolise the time allotted like this."
When the journo protests, reply with: "I'd be delighted to let you ask more in-depth questions needing preambles, but please, not here and now since others are waiting. Contact me and we can schedule an interview, and you can pick the time and place, okay? Even a weekend if that's the only time that works for you!"
And never, ever think media - any media - is on your side, because they aren't. Media isn't on anybody's side: media is its own side. "Te kallisti?" is the unspoken motto of media.
That demonstrates the risk of relying on labels. Some Muslims are psychotic criminals, most are normal people with some odd customs and a tolerance for psychotic criminals. Same as most of the rest of the world. Discrimination based on vague labels of any sort is usually unreliable. We need to have meaningful principles, not simplistic antipathy.
Attack the media who are psychotic propagandists, celebrate the ones who usually get it right. There are many of both. Our success comes from knowing the difference.
This ain't burger King. You can't have it your way. Common usage of "normal" indicates shared values. Those acts that disagree with our values are considered abnormal. We always need to tolerate some abnormalities, but we don't have to like them. Abnormal is where tolerance becomes intolerance. There are degrees of normalcy. It's normal to have some quirks. Some people consider trannies normal. Most don't. Some consider it odd but tolerate it. It's the essence of culture, the fabric of society.
It depends. Fundamental or cosmetic. Here’s my little parable:
Everyone is given an ear of corn. Some use the corn to make corn flakes, some make tortillas, some make cornbread, some make polenta. No problem. The problem is the guy who smashes his ear of corn with a hammer, then demands that others feed him.
My problem is with, say, anyone who is born in or immigrates to a place founded on the concept of a secular civil society and then insists he has the right to enforce on others a concept of blasphemy, or, say, demand the state take custody of what a woman is gestating if they object to her decision on its fate before it's born and enters into legal personhood.
These are equally a threat to the foundational values of our culture.
Actually it's not. It seems to be for a noisy and dangerous minority, so the rest accept it. Kind of like hospitals killing patients with vents and remdesivir, everybody knows it's wrong but feel coerced to accept it. Doctors are western mullahs.
Actually it is. Period. We had riots here in Sweden this Easter over that very thing. Thousans of moslems rioting, burning, looting and assaulting ER crews and firemen trying to do their jobs. More than 150 police hospitalised.
And on the streets were old grandmothers cheering on children trying to burn swedish policemen alive in their cruisers. Little girls cheering on their brothers and fathers hurling rocks at ambulances.
biden threatening the saudis wont go well. if i were the saudis i'd be threatening to give the russians access to examine all the american tech they just bought. the biden regime is the dumbest thing ive ever seen, it will implode soon enough if they dont cause an explosion first
The dumb part is to think we give them weapons. They BUY them. If not from us then where might they go? The Saudi's treat us much better than we treat them in the exchanges.
Okay, I have a new idea. Government, corporations, etc, all utilize the absolute BEST resources and research in crafting and carrying out psychological operations.
This means two things.
1- We don’t have an equal ability to strike first,
But….
2- Once they fire their arrows at us, the survivors are now in possession of those arrows.
(There’s a famous Chinese story, where an emperor gave his top strategist a week to make an absurd amount of arrows, or he would be killed. The strategist got every ship, and every cart, and loaded them with straw. He then laid siege on the enemies walled city, running the ships and the carts right up to the gates, before retreating… when he returned home, the carts and ships full of straw, had more than enough arrows required, all kindly “donated” by the enemy).
We need to examine the weapons used against us, to reuse them.
Example- “you don’t have a right to put my safety at risk, safety trumps freedom”, or some iteration.
Maybe we need to change that to, “You don’t have a right to injure people for profit.”
“Vaccine truth trumps big pharma profits.”
Remember, everything they used against us was studied and crafted to effect the emotional and psychological response. We need to hijack it all.
I've been around so many 'Stacks today I'm getting turned around and we maybe started talked on the 'Stack that I'm referencing here, but the memes on Abir Ballan's 'Stack are a great start. They have to be short and get the thinking juices flowing. This is why I keep coming back to the QR codes, too. I'm imagining something like:
THEY LIED TO YOU ABOUT SAVING GRANDMA
With a QR code in the corner(s) showing 'experts' claiming the vaccine wouldn't stop transmission.
The content might be created digitally, but I believe that analog dispersion is still incredibly important.
Okay analog… let’s start with sex, because that attracts the youngest (hopefully teenage and above).
I’ve already made stickers that say “YOUVE GOT VAIDS” but the “V” is two syringes.
“If he’s vaccinated, make him wear a condom.”
A picture of a thalidomide baby, “If he’s vaccinated make him wear a condom” or “Thanks big pharma… don’t trust the vaccine.”
Free condom bins… cheap dollar tree clear containers that can be backed with double sided sticky tape to public restrooms, free condoms can be grabbed by the barrel from health clinics. “If he/she’s been vaccinated, make him/her wear a condom”
The young ones also need to somehow be made to understand that if they get vaxxed, they will be sterilized & never be able to procreate -AND- that that's a VERY BAD thing. Teen & young 20-something males will probably think it's wonderful, but they're not known for thinking with their "big head" anyway :)
Really? Is it factual? We can’t put out anything that can’t be backed up? Is there a lot of these people? Do they have a group? Do they need a group to talk about their losses and help others? We have to give people a place to go…..traumatized people are not going to be much help
Do we have a website where women can no longer get pregnant since vax? Perhaps women with 1 child that tries for another? We have realnotrare.com to give to people. We need
#1 is the most powerful and the way that we will win. We know there are people who agree with us but aren't yet ready to speak. As the ball gets rolling, more and more people will be willing to speak out, and the desire to fit in will actually work in our favor.
Hero worship is part of that. We can definitely sell the image of heroic, selfless men and women, taking a stand. Oh shit. That ties into their propaganda. We can take their nurse propaganda and make it for the fired nurses.
Make people want to be a part of the brotherhood, part of the resistance. Was t that the premise of the movie Enemy at the Gates, lol?
I tried to find the picture of the nurse with the sign that was like "Treated covid patients for a year. Recovered from covid. Fired for not taking experimental medicine."
People like that should be front and center on the QR videos I was talking about.
Malicious insult to injury. We should make videos of dancing unvaccinated nurses.
I wish I had the funding….
Actors of course, but “dancing nurses” with “unvaccinated” stars of David on their outfits, dancing over people who are keeling over and convulsing from the vaccine,
That would spark some anger. That would make for great video and be a wonderful middle finger to the entire psyop community…
I think the idea is to not provoke, but just put out the facts, ask for answers if they have them. When they don’t answer with facts, just say you didn’t answer the question, where are your facts.
I teared up watching that Cinderella Clip. It reminded me of the millions of people who were likely in that same situation during the 2020 criminal lockdown event. These politicians need to pay a price for their criminal activities.
All well said in this paper! Thanks. I really do think we have reached a point where awareness is arriving about how out of kilter we have become. Driven there by those who think of themselves first and maybe last instead of doing their damn jobs of making public policy for the whole of us.
It has been amazing to see how much has come undone in such a short period.
Operating in an environment where “disinformation” is not allowed.
Let’s clear something up to begin with…disinformation is already illegal in the west, including America. It’s called slander and libel laws…
So now we get to play the game called “legal loophole”.
If you read the “news” in America with an eye for this, you learn some pretty crafty tricks.
I’ve named these tactics myself, as I don’t know if they have an official name, but I am pretty good at pattern recognition, so I see these things over and over.
THE ANONYMOUS SOURCE/ A FALL GUY
The fall guy can be an anonymized source, or a disposable “journalist”. The way this works, is the “anonymous source” or the fall guy, makes a statement that’s false. “Hospitals are overwhelmed by ivermectin overdoses”. (Rolling Stone Oklahoma hospitals overloaded). THEN, every other outlet is free to repeat the story, citing the original. This is done to flood the market of information with a narrative. MSNBC, ABC, etc, escape liability, because they didn’t lie, they told the truth, and from their end, the “truth” is… “rolling stone reports hospitals are overwhelmed by ivermectin.” -see how this is being played?
This is perpetuated until they are held liable for a false story. Rolling stone then issues an “update” and corrects the story, quietly. This satisfies the legal liability. The other “news” organizations don’t say anything,they don’t have to, and they quickly move to the next legal lie…
EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION-
This one’s self explanatory, and since it’s emotional, facts don’t matter. If someone gets shot, flood the air with crying mothers. Ignore the rape victim that defended herself with a gun.
Broadcast the white personal who said the “N” word, 24/7, have panels of people using emotionally charged language…. Ignore the black man who shot a white toddler in the face over his skin color (this is also the realm of selective omission).
Music selection is key here too, as are lighting filters. Make gun stores seem darker, with unsettling music. Turn up the brightness for the gay parade, play a happy tune in the background.
Emotional manipulation leads to our next tactic…
FALSE POLLS-
Everyone is biologically hardwired to fit into the group. Historic outliers weren’t really outliers for the sake of it. They were outliers because they discovered a truth and held to it in the face of all odds. For the rest of us, we just want to fit in, be ignored, be the grey man. Fitting in is a major component of that.
The laugh and clapping tracks for sitcoms and late night talk shows do this very well. That’s classic manipulation. You have one person on who says something that’s actually controversial, and the cheering track gets dubbed in post. The morons at home who eat this crap up, think this is normal human behavior, and support it. False polls work the same way. They lie, or manipulate people into steering a specific narrative. Others see that the group dynamic trends a certain way, and are more likely to support it, or tolerate it.
The media would lose their shit if you held a “poll” that supported deporting all the Jews out of the USA. I guarantee you I could get a poll to say just that, within the hour. Polls serve NO purpose, other than to manipulate your thought pattern.
LOADED QUESTIONS LEADING TO SOUNDBITES-
Everyone should be wise to these tricks by now, especially after watching the media do this to trump for 4 years.
In action, you would interview a doctor. “Should EVERYONE take this vaccine? What about people allergic to it?” The doctor then says, “well, not everyone should take the vaccine.” There’s your sound bite. A nice clip, “Not everyone should take the vaccine.”
EXTREMES.
I always see this one used for gun owners, “so should everyone get to own a nuclear weapon?” Then the gun owner is stuck in a conundrum. If they say yes, they get spun as unhinged and unworthy of an audience. If they say no, then it’s the “AHA! So you DO support some restrictions.” I never see this done the other way… “Do you support murdering your 30 year old son with a machete? No? “AHA! So you DO believe your son is a human life, and you do support SOME restrictions on abortion.”
LIES OF OMISSION-
Classic media tactics, it’s basically their standard operating procedure at this point. Cover only the stuff you want, that furthers the narrative. Ignore everything else.
THE LAST WORD-
Always end your story with the counter argument that supports your side. Pick a topic, let’s say abortion, and you actually appear to give both sides a fair shake at it. End the story with the woman who wished she could have had one, or the woman who had an illegal procedure and was injured. Humans resort to physical violence over getting the last word, because it’s that important. The media controls the last word.
“SCARE QUOTES”
Put the opposing sides words in quotations. It’s the proper thing to do, technically… but today we take it to mean “that’s what they say”. Putting quotes makes the other side less credible. Example. “Safe and effective” is a great use of those quotes.
DISCREDIT THE OPPOSING SIDE-
Unnecessarily toss dirt onto the person making statements, to make everything else they say seem less credible. Example,
“SimulationCommander just released a new Substack titled “this is not a drill”. The new Substack release comes amidst allegations that he beat his wife and cooked their pet cat in a microwave.”
(Don’t worry, we’ll make an “update” later to correct what our “anonymous source” told us…after the damage is done).
THE VIDEO/STAT COMBO-
This tactic is lowdown, dirty, and constantly used. Here’s two examples I’m very familiar with.
I forget the numbers, but black on Asian hate crimes are rampant. You can look these stats up, and see for yourself that Asian Americans are disproportionally attacked by black Americans. Never mind the why, it’s just how it shakes out. A video will surface (with no context of course) of a white man punching an Asian. The media then shows the video, and says “Asians are disproportionally attacked in hate crimes, and hate crimes against asians are UP!” The ignorant viewer hears the stats, and sees the video, and thinks whites are attacking asians. The media then slims it over to their “discussion panel” to discuss “white supremacy, out of context, to solidify the idea that whites are attacking asians.
I also see this with mass shootings. A mass shooting is defined as 4 or more people shot. Well, there’s a ton of that in inner cities due to gang and drug violence. The media ignores this, but when a real mass shooting happens, like at a school, the media whips out the “mass shooting stats”. Now the ignorant observer thinks a school shooting happens 35 times a year, when it’s more like, every few years, and is extremely rare.
Okay, there’s so much more, but you get the idea. I can add other tactics or combination of tactics, as the media uses them. You can operate freely and legally in non permissive environments, using loopholes. You don’t have to use them all at once, the media taught us the way.
This is an amazing post. I have the tiniest background in journalism and marketing and you really nail what I'm seeing on the TV. The biggest culprit is the "reports X" or "says X", which allows the media to completely 'lie' without 'lying' because technically they're only reporting that X SAID it, not the thing itself.
My friends and I used to joke about this (ironically skewering FOX News at the time) with a series of headlines that turns a complete lie into a 'fact'.
--------------
Does Obama eat babies? I'm not saying Obama eats babies, but we should ask the question.
The fact we are even asking if Obama eats babies is a red flag for sure. What is he hiding?
Everybody's wondering if Obama eats babies. We dive into this explosive story next.
Multiple sources report on Obama's baby-eating behavior! Shocking new bombshell!
Look, everybody knows Obama eats babies. What are we going to do about it?
This tactic is so well known, it can get you in a lot of trouble in a court room if you try to use it, as it’s unethical. The judge can tell the jury to ignore the comment, but they can’t unhear it…the damage is done.
A proper way to use your example now is, “Wasn’t Obama on the Epstein flight log? I heard Obama went to Epsteins island, I mean, maybe that’s why they won’t release the information on the names of the clients.”
Great post. I believe the truest statement is about the real work now beginning. This isn't over by a long shot. Though there is a glimmer of light on the horizon, we have a long way to go. IMO, there is a lot of hardship coming in many ways. This is going to really test us and will truly separate the strong from the weak and the courageous from the cowards. We have s couple of generations who've never known a missed meal. Maybe I'll be wrong and everything will turn around and happy days will be here again...but I don't think so. And, actually, I don't want those happy days to magically reappear because it's going to take some hardship for us to find the good in ourselves and learn what really matters in life. There's more to life than a 70,000$ pickup, a 5 bedroom 3 bath home, a camper, a boat, a snowmobile (and the list goes on). Until we realize that material wealth is not the most important thing in life, I'm not sure things will ever turn around. But, again, maybe I'll be wrong. Thanks for this SC. Thought provoking.
Agree. There's a price that will be paid.
The reason the covid insanity went on so long was that very few people were willing to pay any price whatsoever.
That will be the biggest challenge. The "good" news out of all the bad news is that millions of people did end up paying a price in the end - and now the country.
Sometimes pain has to show up to your front door in order to wake up.
Great strategy. Great essay. Couple things we need to consider more carefully.
The most startling observation has been the ease with which most of the world acquiesced to medical tyranny which produced the oppression. Human culture has changed. We now prefer safe spaces to independence, welfare to self reliance. We have become wards of the state, Marxists without the label. That ingrained indoctrination will be difficult to overcome. No matter how many lions rise up, most people will remain frightened and submissive, probably more so as conflict approaches. We're not lions to them, we're ultra Maga -- the enemy.
We must remember that there are degrees of civility. The approach most have taken is that of choir boys -- quiet, submissive, docile. A few become emotional, expressing outrage in emotional outbursts. Marching on the capitol led some to don bizarre costumes and violate standards of civility and law to express their dissatisfaction. How's that working? There is a big range of responses in between. Effective resistance needs to be firm and businesslike, clearly expressing demands with only enough emotion to signal to the oppressors that we're ready to escalate as needed. That's a learned skill that few have mastered, and most don't want to. Whining or screaming are their only options. We need to wear passive aggression like a badge. Fuck with the bull and you'll get the horns. Be the bulls, not cows.
Modern societies everywhere suffer from an excess of civility, instilled by our masters who need to suppress our independence to maintain their control. That will take time to overcome, requiring retraining for most of the population, indoctrinated in woke political correctness for several generations. But it can be accelerated by ever present examples, and constant reminders that tyranny will be opposed. Lions are not feared because they're big and strong, but because they might decide to eat you.
I heard a story recently of a US senator, don't recall who nor the circumstances, who said our problems are all because we stopped kicking asses. That's the only way to reverse our slide into Marxist oblivion.
As the Marines say, be polite and diplomatic, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
Aristotle’s Politics: there’s a passage in it that discusses the isolation and atomization of the citizenry. I’m pasting it in below, with a link to a translation that's on an MIT website:
http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.5.five.html
Such are the notes of the tyrant and the arts by which he preserves his power; there is no wickedness too great for him. All that we have said may be summed up under three heads, which answer to the three aims of the tyrant. These are, (1) the humiliation of his subjects; he knows that a mean-spirited man will not conspire against anybody; (2) the creation of mistrust among them; for a tyrant is not overthrown until men begin to have confidence in one another; and this is the reason why tyrants are at war with the good; they are under the idea that their power is endangered by them, not only because they would not be ruled despotically but also because they are loyal to one another, and to other men, and do not inform against one another or against other men; (3) the tyrant desires that his subjects shall be incapable of action, for no one attempts what is impossible, and they will not attempt to overthrow a tyranny, if they are powerless. Under these three heads the whole policy of a tyrant may be summed up, and to one or other of them all his ideas may be referred: (1) he sows distrust among his subjects; (2) he takes away their power; (3) he humbles them.
Same as it ever was..........
The pre-Enlightenment writers on government (Shakespeare, Aristotle, etc.) are very sharp about tyranny. It fits with how brutal and direct their governments were.
I thought it was not coincidental that independent, privately owned restaurants were a particular target of lockdowns, one of hardest-hit sectors. Many were forced out of business. They represent a natural, anonymous meeting place for like-minded people to discuss ideas.
Ayn Rand observed that totalitarian plans rely on the sanction of their victims to keep themselves in business. There has been much discussion about boycotts of various businesses, but it seems like we haven’t gotten serious about withdrawing support from those who are promoting this. Lots of talk, but public schools are convenient, as are Amazon and Netflix. We need to get serious about eschewing convenience and withdrawing financial support. Although I do wonder when I believe most have withdrawn from MSM, and that still seems to be going strong...
Wonderful article. I had no idea about Kanye West being "de-banked," which is disturbing to say the least. I suppose it was because he espoused "anti-semitic" tropes, meaning he espoused the beliefs of the Black Hebrew Israelites, a group that's been around for nearly 150 years. Or maybe he said "White Lives Matter." Someone needs to make a shirt: "No lives matter (to us), sincerely, your government."
Fortunately I live in a more conservative area (and that I feel fortunate about that shows how times have changed). I've been threatening for a while to get a sign for my lawn that reads, "Virtue signaling and meaningless slogans have no home here." Maybe it's time.
I want to respond to your article, to join the conversation, but my multitude of thoughts are a jumble, so please bear with me.
It’s been nearly a year since Inslee’s mandate meant the Edmonds School District could “terminate” me, even though I was a highly sought-after substitute teacher with a stellar reputation. Inslee has had emergency powers for nearly 1000 days, but here in WA, few seem to know that a mandate is still in place. The only unvaxxed people I know in WA are my husband and 2 of our 6 adult children. It’s a lonely place to live. All of my friends and extended family have taken some numbers of injections. I have had conversations that have risked friendships and at this point, I don’t know how to walk that line with people who clearly are NOT going to see things the way we do. My job loss was a “choice” I made (in their view).
Here’s what I want: the district to restore my job (without me having to jump through any hoops) and the wages I have lost this past year. But I don’t even know who else got terminated or how to find out. I don’t know how to get that information so we can band together.
I pray a lot, especially that truth will be revealed, and that those I love will have their eyes opened while being protected from harm. I worry about them just as much as they worry about my unvaccinated self. So sad, really.
Lastly, there is a great resource for having conversations at reachingpeople.net. It’s where I have learned to understand why reaching those I love with the truth has been so difficult, and how to temper my words so that I can convey them with calmness for greater impact. I don’t get these opportunities often, but it’s good to be prepared.
You're exactly the type of 'Group 1' person that we need to know about so we can support you! Many of us here are in Washington, and I bet that at least some of us are in your area! That's the makings of a local support network!
You need to get a new government for that to happen. Join and become active in political groups that most closely match your thoughts. This is war, and victory won't come from hope, but from action.
I agree with everything you said. And not to be pessimistic, but we do need a realistic understanding of what we’re up against. We have been almost checkmated from the very beginning of the Spectacle. As acknowledged, none of us own any part of our mass communication infrastructure and if things ever got bad enough for TPTB, I can see someone pulling the plug entirely. That is why physical connections are important, but that applies in so many other ways. I’m not sure if we can take control of the wheel before someone hits the self-destruct or even if we’d want to. And again, it goes way beyond communication… when the lettuce you buy in Maine all comes from Arizona, you have a looming problem.
That’s why I feel there is a two pronged counter that needs to be adopted: fighting against the organized technocratic fascist state before we’re all in pens that we can’t escape from and developing self-sustainable, small communities as breakaway civilizations, so to speak. I’ve realized though that while the pieces have been obviously moved over the last few decades to achieving the former, there has been nearly as much work put in to prevent the latter by labeling movements as cults, militias, domestic terrorists, etc. We can only succeed by doing both things, simultaneously and strategically, with great intelligence and planning.
When viewed through the lens of history, I cannot arrive at any other conclusion that to go forward, we must “get small.” Massive civilization is always doomed to failure because of the nature of human beings… one sociopath in a group of a 1,000 can be stopped, that same rate in a country of millions will end up with the cover of personal anonymity to rise to the top. Again, this is where the Spectacle works for them, by creating a mask of public persona. As long as that apparatus exists, I see no end to corruption and authoritarian control. We must stop dealing with avatars and start dealing with people.
It is not hopeless, but it is a lifetime of work. Maybe many lifetimes, but I cannot think of a more worthy cause.
Oho ho ho! Liberal moslems are generally more conservative and traditional than conservative christians, so that's just business as normal. For what the average moslem thinks you can check out World Value Survey-reports, not the graphs but the actual reports, and the Arab Youth Survey; both are freely available online.
In those you'll find such things as virtually all moslems thinks homoseuxality is a criminal act which should mean prison, at least for a first offence, and anywhere between 40% and 95% depending on nation and age bracket thinks it deserves execution - and those aren't the extremists, those are the normal average Mohameds and Youssufs and Aishas. The extremists are the guys calling for public floggings for whistling - which is not a joke, by the way.
Anyway, good post! If you take suggestions, here's one from me, seeing as I was a "radical activist" in my youth though that label wasn't in use then:
Agree to stick to one issue in one group.
If you meet up with nineteen others to organise protests against a local school board trying to normalise pedophilia via the LGBTPQ-agenda, stick with that and make sure all agree to sticking with that - even if you might have a hobby horse regarding open carry, and Elsa might be into getting a vegan food option for school lunch and Jody wants the school to run a mini-farm for teaching OTG eco-living and so on - stick with the one issue you are united on.
Another thing: be aware that when journos come sniffing like dogs after a bitch in heat, they always have an agenda (yeah, I know you know but it benefits us all seeing it repeated) and they will try to use questions to sow dissent among you:
"You John Jones is a local very succesful business-owner, having taken over your father's multi-million dollar business a few years back, and Jill Jilligan here you worked your way up from being homeless to having your own food van - who would you say have had to work the hardest at success, seeing as you are both protesting proposition T34/75 on 'Equity and resource equality in the educational environment'?"
Questions like that are meant to entrap, and get you to show dissent and to start you fighting each-other, in front of potential sympathisers. Any time a journalist or other person starts their question with a long preamble, they are setting this kind of trap. Cut them off, politely and apologetically:
"Please, if you could just ask your question? As you see, there are many others here who also have questions to ask and I'm afraid it would be most unfair to let you monopolise the time allotted like this."
When the journo protests, reply with: "I'd be delighted to let you ask more in-depth questions needing preambles, but please, not here and now since others are waiting. Contact me and we can schedule an interview, and you can pick the time and place, okay? Even a weekend if that's the only time that works for you!"
And never, ever think media - any media - is on your side, because they aren't. Media isn't on anybody's side: media is its own side. "Te kallisti?" is the unspoken motto of media.
That demonstrates the risk of relying on labels. Some Muslims are psychotic criminals, most are normal people with some odd customs and a tolerance for psychotic criminals. Same as most of the rest of the world. Discrimination based on vague labels of any sort is usually unreliable. We need to have meaningful principles, not simplistic antipathy.
Attack the media who are psychotic propagandists, celebrate the ones who usually get it right. There are many of both. Our success comes from knowing the difference.
What does "normal" mean?
People say things like "everyone wants the same things/everyone wants to be happy/everyone wants the best for their children."
Yeah, sure, but it depends entirely on how one defines each term and what the steps to achieve its fulfillment look like.
This ain't burger King. You can't have it your way. Common usage of "normal" indicates shared values. Those acts that disagree with our values are considered abnormal. We always need to tolerate some abnormalities, but we don't have to like them. Abnormal is where tolerance becomes intolerance. There are degrees of normalcy. It's normal to have some quirks. Some people consider trannies normal. Most don't. Some consider it odd but tolerate it. It's the essence of culture, the fabric of society.
It is exactly the essence of culture.
That's why any particular culture cannot accommodate others without losing its own nature.
It depends. Fundamental or cosmetic. Here’s my little parable:
Everyone is given an ear of corn. Some use the corn to make corn flakes, some make tortillas, some make cornbread, some make polenta. No problem. The problem is the guy who smashes his ear of corn with a hammer, then demands that others feed him.
Someone wants to accede to his demand, let them.
My problem is with, say, anyone who is born in or immigrates to a place founded on the concept of a secular civil society and then insists he has the right to enforce on others a concept of blasphemy, or, say, demand the state take custody of what a woman is gestating if they object to her decision on its fate before it's born and enters into legal personhood.
These are equally a threat to the foundational values of our culture.
Cultures evolve. Most people consider slow evolution normal.
For most moslems, wanting to burn alive someone who makes a drawing of their prophet is normal.
Actually it's not. It seems to be for a noisy and dangerous minority, so the rest accept it. Kind of like hospitals killing patients with vents and remdesivir, everybody knows it's wrong but feel coerced to accept it. Doctors are western mullahs.
Actually it is. Period. We had riots here in Sweden this Easter over that very thing. Thousans of moslems rioting, burning, looting and assaulting ER crews and firemen trying to do their jobs. More than 150 police hospitalised.
And on the streets were old grandmothers cheering on children trying to burn swedish policemen alive in their cruisers. Little girls cheering on their brothers and fathers hurling rocks at ambulances.
So no, you are very, very wrong.
biden threatening the saudis wont go well. if i were the saudis i'd be threatening to give the russians access to examine all the american tech they just bought. the biden regime is the dumbest thing ive ever seen, it will implode soon enough if they dont cause an explosion first
The dumb part is to think we give them weapons. They BUY them. If not from us then where might they go? The Saudi's treat us much better than we treat them in the exchanges.
Here's an example of a place where we might be able to make a real-world appearance:
https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=20364
Masks reinstated for university libraries after professors voiced opposition to previously lifted mandate
Rutgers University announced it would be reinstating a mask mandate at campus libraries and in individual classrooms if a professor requires it.
Students will also be forced to wear masks in the classroom if their professor decides to require them for the class.
Okay, I have a new idea. Government, corporations, etc, all utilize the absolute BEST resources and research in crafting and carrying out psychological operations.
This means two things.
1- We don’t have an equal ability to strike first,
But….
2- Once they fire their arrows at us, the survivors are now in possession of those arrows.
(There’s a famous Chinese story, where an emperor gave his top strategist a week to make an absurd amount of arrows, or he would be killed. The strategist got every ship, and every cart, and loaded them with straw. He then laid siege on the enemies walled city, running the ships and the carts right up to the gates, before retreating… when he returned home, the carts and ships full of straw, had more than enough arrows required, all kindly “donated” by the enemy).
We need to examine the weapons used against us, to reuse them.
Example- “you don’t have a right to put my safety at risk, safety trumps freedom”, or some iteration.
Maybe we need to change that to, “You don’t have a right to injure people for profit.”
“Vaccine truth trumps big pharma profits.”
Remember, everything they used against us was studied and crafted to effect the emotional and psychological response. We need to hijack it all.
Ideas?…..
I've been around so many 'Stacks today I'm getting turned around and we maybe started talked on the 'Stack that I'm referencing here, but the memes on Abir Ballan's 'Stack are a great start. They have to be short and get the thinking juices flowing. This is why I keep coming back to the QR codes, too. I'm imagining something like:
THEY LIED TO YOU ABOUT SAVING GRANDMA
With a QR code in the corner(s) showing 'experts' claiming the vaccine wouldn't stop transmission.
The content might be created digitally, but I believe that analog dispersion is still incredibly important.
Edit: Adding link https://abirballan.substack.com/
“Vaccine injury is NOT your fault.”
A campaign to normalize and speak openly about vaccine injury.
“Feeling off? Could be vaccine injury. It’s not your fault. You were forced.”
I really liked the one that said "Protect others, report vaccine side effects"
My only problem with that one is once I see the “protect others” I thought it was a pro vaxx sticker.
But that works too.
It’s going to take all types of propaganda. Everyone has different personalities and different ways of breaking through to them.
I’d like to think on that one and make some similar.
Oh that is good then say give this to others: realnotrare.com
Okay analog… let’s start with sex, because that attracts the youngest (hopefully teenage and above).
I’ve already made stickers that say “YOUVE GOT VAIDS” but the “V” is two syringes.
“If he’s vaccinated, make him wear a condom.”
A picture of a thalidomide baby, “If he’s vaccinated make him wear a condom” or “Thanks big pharma… don’t trust the vaccine.”
Free condom bins… cheap dollar tree clear containers that can be backed with double sided sticky tape to public restrooms, free condoms can be grabbed by the barrel from health clinics. “If he/she’s been vaccinated, make him/her wear a condom”
The young ones also need to somehow be made to understand that if they get vaxxed, they will be sterilized & never be able to procreate -AND- that that's a VERY BAD thing. Teen & young 20-something males will probably think it's wonderful, but they're not known for thinking with their "big head" anyway :)
I think sterilization won’t dissuade them
HOWEVER…. There is a side effect from the vaccine called genital necrosis.
There’s some great medical literature with photos of penises and vaginas rotting off.
That would make for a great sticker.
Yep, that should work !!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34839563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9011818/
Really? Is it factual? We can’t put out anything that can’t be backed up? Is there a lot of these people? Do they have a group? Do they need a group to talk about their losses and help others? We have to give people a place to go…..traumatized people are not going to be much help
Do we have a website where women can no longer get pregnant since vax? Perhaps women with 1 child that tries for another? We have realnotrare.com to give to people. We need
Okay. On a base level, humans operate out of:
Desire to fit in
Sex
Food
Fear
Anger
Jealousy.
Let’s start there.
#1 is the most powerful and the way that we will win. We know there are people who agree with us but aren't yet ready to speak. As the ball gets rolling, more and more people will be willing to speak out, and the desire to fit in will actually work in our favor.
That's the plan, anyway.
Desire to fit in…
Hero worship is part of that. We can definitely sell the image of heroic, selfless men and women, taking a stand. Oh shit. That ties into their propaganda. We can take their nurse propaganda and make it for the fired nurses.
Make people want to be a part of the brotherhood, part of the resistance. Was t that the premise of the movie Enemy at the Gates, lol?
I tried to find the picture of the nurse with the sign that was like "Treated covid patients for a year. Recovered from covid. Fired for not taking experimental medicine."
People like that should be front and center on the QR videos I was talking about.
I WAS A HERO UNTIL I STOOD UP TO BIG PHARMA
Malicious insult to injury. We should make videos of dancing unvaccinated nurses.
I wish I had the funding….
Actors of course, but “dancing nurses” with “unvaccinated” stars of David on their outfits, dancing over people who are keeling over and convulsing from the vaccine,
That would spark some anger. That would make for great video and be a wonderful middle finger to the entire psyop community…
I think the idea is to not provoke, but just put out the facts, ask for answers if they have them. When they don’t answer with facts, just say you didn’t answer the question, where are your facts.
I teared up watching that Cinderella Clip. It reminded me of the millions of people who were likely in that same situation during the 2020 criminal lockdown event. These politicians need to pay a price for their criminal activities.
I guess it’s generational, but rather than Cinderella Man, I keep telling my husband that I hear the faint beginnings of the Rocky music!
All well said in this paper! Thanks. I really do think we have reached a point where awareness is arriving about how out of kilter we have become. Driven there by those who think of themselves first and maybe last instead of doing their damn jobs of making public policy for the whole of us.
It has been amazing to see how much has come undone in such a short period.
This is VERY good -- it can be summarized as “death to fascism -- freedom for people” -- the immortal socialist motto for a century...
> Can you be this woman? Can you sit calmly while an idiot gets in your face and yells about how you’re being antagonistic?
No. I will headbutt that person absolutely as hard as I can across the bridge of their nose and then throat punch them.
This is why I don't go to protests.
Operating in an environment where “disinformation” is not allowed.
Let’s clear something up to begin with…disinformation is already illegal in the west, including America. It’s called slander and libel laws…
So now we get to play the game called “legal loophole”.
If you read the “news” in America with an eye for this, you learn some pretty crafty tricks.
I’ve named these tactics myself, as I don’t know if they have an official name, but I am pretty good at pattern recognition, so I see these things over and over.
THE ANONYMOUS SOURCE/ A FALL GUY
The fall guy can be an anonymized source, or a disposable “journalist”. The way this works, is the “anonymous source” or the fall guy, makes a statement that’s false. “Hospitals are overwhelmed by ivermectin overdoses”. (Rolling Stone Oklahoma hospitals overloaded). THEN, every other outlet is free to repeat the story, citing the original. This is done to flood the market of information with a narrative. MSNBC, ABC, etc, escape liability, because they didn’t lie, they told the truth, and from their end, the “truth” is… “rolling stone reports hospitals are overwhelmed by ivermectin.” -see how this is being played?
This is perpetuated until they are held liable for a false story. Rolling stone then issues an “update” and corrects the story, quietly. This satisfies the legal liability. The other “news” organizations don’t say anything,they don’t have to, and they quickly move to the next legal lie…
EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION-
This one’s self explanatory, and since it’s emotional, facts don’t matter. If someone gets shot, flood the air with crying mothers. Ignore the rape victim that defended herself with a gun.
Broadcast the white personal who said the “N” word, 24/7, have panels of people using emotionally charged language…. Ignore the black man who shot a white toddler in the face over his skin color (this is also the realm of selective omission).
Music selection is key here too, as are lighting filters. Make gun stores seem darker, with unsettling music. Turn up the brightness for the gay parade, play a happy tune in the background.
Emotional manipulation leads to our next tactic…
FALSE POLLS-
Everyone is biologically hardwired to fit into the group. Historic outliers weren’t really outliers for the sake of it. They were outliers because they discovered a truth and held to it in the face of all odds. For the rest of us, we just want to fit in, be ignored, be the grey man. Fitting in is a major component of that.
The laugh and clapping tracks for sitcoms and late night talk shows do this very well. That’s classic manipulation. You have one person on who says something that’s actually controversial, and the cheering track gets dubbed in post. The morons at home who eat this crap up, think this is normal human behavior, and support it. False polls work the same way. They lie, or manipulate people into steering a specific narrative. Others see that the group dynamic trends a certain way, and are more likely to support it, or tolerate it.
The media would lose their shit if you held a “poll” that supported deporting all the Jews out of the USA. I guarantee you I could get a poll to say just that, within the hour. Polls serve NO purpose, other than to manipulate your thought pattern.
LOADED QUESTIONS LEADING TO SOUNDBITES-
Everyone should be wise to these tricks by now, especially after watching the media do this to trump for 4 years.
In action, you would interview a doctor. “Should EVERYONE take this vaccine? What about people allergic to it?” The doctor then says, “well, not everyone should take the vaccine.” There’s your sound bite. A nice clip, “Not everyone should take the vaccine.”
EXTREMES.
I always see this one used for gun owners, “so should everyone get to own a nuclear weapon?” Then the gun owner is stuck in a conundrum. If they say yes, they get spun as unhinged and unworthy of an audience. If they say no, then it’s the “AHA! So you DO support some restrictions.” I never see this done the other way… “Do you support murdering your 30 year old son with a machete? No? “AHA! So you DO believe your son is a human life, and you do support SOME restrictions on abortion.”
LIES OF OMISSION-
Classic media tactics, it’s basically their standard operating procedure at this point. Cover only the stuff you want, that furthers the narrative. Ignore everything else.
THE LAST WORD-
Always end your story with the counter argument that supports your side. Pick a topic, let’s say abortion, and you actually appear to give both sides a fair shake at it. End the story with the woman who wished she could have had one, or the woman who had an illegal procedure and was injured. Humans resort to physical violence over getting the last word, because it’s that important. The media controls the last word.
“SCARE QUOTES”
Put the opposing sides words in quotations. It’s the proper thing to do, technically… but today we take it to mean “that’s what they say”. Putting quotes makes the other side less credible. Example. “Safe and effective” is a great use of those quotes.
DISCREDIT THE OPPOSING SIDE-
Unnecessarily toss dirt onto the person making statements, to make everything else they say seem less credible. Example,
“SimulationCommander just released a new Substack titled “this is not a drill”. The new Substack release comes amidst allegations that he beat his wife and cooked their pet cat in a microwave.”
(Don’t worry, we’ll make an “update” later to correct what our “anonymous source” told us…after the damage is done).
THE VIDEO/STAT COMBO-
This tactic is lowdown, dirty, and constantly used. Here’s two examples I’m very familiar with.
I forget the numbers, but black on Asian hate crimes are rampant. You can look these stats up, and see for yourself that Asian Americans are disproportionally attacked by black Americans. Never mind the why, it’s just how it shakes out. A video will surface (with no context of course) of a white man punching an Asian. The media then shows the video, and says “Asians are disproportionally attacked in hate crimes, and hate crimes against asians are UP!” The ignorant viewer hears the stats, and sees the video, and thinks whites are attacking asians. The media then slims it over to their “discussion panel” to discuss “white supremacy, out of context, to solidify the idea that whites are attacking asians.
I also see this with mass shootings. A mass shooting is defined as 4 or more people shot. Well, there’s a ton of that in inner cities due to gang and drug violence. The media ignores this, but when a real mass shooting happens, like at a school, the media whips out the “mass shooting stats”. Now the ignorant observer thinks a school shooting happens 35 times a year, when it’s more like, every few years, and is extremely rare.
Okay, there’s so much more, but you get the idea. I can add other tactics or combination of tactics, as the media uses them. You can operate freely and legally in non permissive environments, using loopholes. You don’t have to use them all at once, the media taught us the way.
This is an amazing post. I have the tiniest background in journalism and marketing and you really nail what I'm seeing on the TV. The biggest culprit is the "reports X" or "says X", which allows the media to completely 'lie' without 'lying' because technically they're only reporting that X SAID it, not the thing itself.
My friends and I used to joke about this (ironically skewering FOX News at the time) with a series of headlines that turns a complete lie into a 'fact'.
--------------
Does Obama eat babies? I'm not saying Obama eats babies, but we should ask the question.
The fact we are even asking if Obama eats babies is a red flag for sure. What is he hiding?
Everybody's wondering if Obama eats babies. We dive into this explosive story next.
Multiple sources report on Obama's baby-eating behavior! Shocking new bombshell!
Look, everybody knows Obama eats babies. What are we going to do about it?
This tactic is so well known, it can get you in a lot of trouble in a court room if you try to use it, as it’s unethical. The judge can tell the jury to ignore the comment, but they can’t unhear it…the damage is done.
A proper way to use your example now is, “Wasn’t Obama on the Epstein flight log? I heard Obama went to Epsteins island, I mean, maybe that’s why they won’t release the information on the names of the clients.”
Edited for typos
But like I said on the other Substack before I jumped onboard here… I’m an analog propagandist in a digital world.
Fortunately for us, everything is the same, just the delivery method changed. And I’m telling you, that methods becoming obsolete, very quickly.