I don't think Oregon "learned", it just got its hand slapped for once. I'll believe they've learned when they actually arrest people and keep them in prison after the next riots.
I don't think Oregon "learned", it just got its hand slapped for once. I'll believe they've learned when they actually arrest people and keep them in prison after the next riots.
The backlash from this proposed bill was epic -- and it was ironically based mostly from Portland, which has been dealing with similar laws for a few years. (The local government is finally calling the situation an emergency and is preparing to spend something like 100K per "person experiencing homelessness".........I wonder what will happen!)
100k per person that will go to the grifters pretending to "solve" the issue. It is in their best interest to NOT solve the problem but prolong it indefinitely.
What will happen is more homelessness. If I was on the verge of fiscal calamity and my city was going to spend a hundred grand on me, I might walk away from the daily struggle as well.
Admittedly I don't hang out there much, but the last time I went in I was gobsmacked at how large the space was and how much of it was "luxury" stuff like scented candles/soaps, etc. Some quick back-of-the-envelope math put their monthly rent about $40,000 -- and this was years before the pandemic. (They could have owned the land, maybe?)
I would presume that places of that nature tend to buy and build, so they can ride rising land prices. Maybe not. Either way, I think it's probably time to go buy a nice set of new kitchen knives.
I don't think Oregon "learned", it just got its hand slapped for once. I'll believe they've learned when they actually arrest people and keep them in prison after the next riots.
The backlash from this proposed bill was epic -- and it was ironically based mostly from Portland, which has been dealing with similar laws for a few years. (The local government is finally calling the situation an emergency and is preparing to spend something like 100K per "person experiencing homelessness".........I wonder what will happen!)
100k per person that will go to the grifters pretending to "solve" the issue. It is in their best interest to NOT solve the problem but prolong it indefinitely.
Yep. And we have hundreds of these little mini-fiefdoms out there.
$100k is what the taxpayer pays but the homeless person will see only a fraction of the value.
What will happen is more homelessness. If I was on the verge of fiscal calamity and my city was going to spend a hundred grand on me, I might walk away from the daily struggle as well.
The community organizers and NGOтАЩs get $99,900. You the homeless person might net $100.
Amazingly, that hundred grand won't actually net you anything.
It'd pay off my debts and put me in a position to feel a lot more stable, but then again, I'm employable.
LOL you're not actually getting $100,000. The "non-profit" will spend $100,000 on your "services".
Heh, I thought you were making a comment on how little $100k will actually get you these days.
Even less when first run through the Portland government.
One way plane tickets to Mexico City don't cost that much. Think of it as a trade for all the people they're sending our way.
ЁЯШВЁЯдг
I don't see Bed Bath and Beyond as particularly "luxury", though. I mean, you need to buy sheets somewhere...
Admittedly I don't hang out there much, but the last time I went in I was gobsmacked at how large the space was and how much of it was "luxury" stuff like scented candles/soaps, etc. Some quick back-of-the-envelope math put their monthly rent about $40,000 -- and this was years before the pandemic. (They could have owned the land, maybe?)
I would presume that places of that nature tend to buy and build, so they can ride rising land prices. Maybe not. Either way, I think it's probably time to go buy a nice set of new kitchen knives.
The area was fairly undeveloped at the time, so it's certainly a possibility. I think that Wal-mart does this.