63 Comments

Brad - Sund's testimony and interviews tell one everything they need to know Mr. Mulder

Expand full comment
founding
Oct 12, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

Thanks for the very informative article, (I learned a lot) and Iā€™m glad it was highlighted here so as to get more eyes on it. (For anyone who has been missing out on Euphoric Recall....go subscribe now!)

Also, I love this comment section with two of my very favourite Substack authors teaming up!

Expand full comment
Oct 12, 2023Liked by Brad

Consider this too, as an appendix to your great article:

What if: The FBI planned for a violent takeover on January 6th in case Trump won the election, despite fortified voting et c?

Meaning, in that case there would have been BLM-thugs, Antifa-operatives and ditto soldiers, and as many more as could be instigated to show up at the Capitol, to oust Trump.

As it were, Biden won (or "won") and the plan instead was re-worked from election day to January 6th to be the one we saw carried out.

Possible, yes - but plausible? I'd say so, because when you work in information, you don't plan for unilateral silo-like events; you plan using sprawling spreadsheets of If-Then-sequences. The core plan and objective remains the same, the paths taken to reach it may change and be fluid.

Expand full comment

May have been orchestrated? Yeah, I got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell...or maybe a Nice swamp in Florida?

Expand full comment

I am a subject of intensive FBI crime and misconduct.

I have sacrificed some personal safety to publish my Google Docs about the FBI:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQxjNA7yFSwArLCShFo-JwZS5VangA8QFQpxUmX3Ccmvq2ozUgfJAfOfxlmY8a_NDwFYDwy5-QBc8qo/pub

The FBI is retaliating, forcibly drugging me with dangerous drugs not approved by the FDA.

I am looking for readers who take my Google Docs as seriously as the FBI does.

I am soliciting nothing in particular. I would think you all might want to follow up on the cancer-cure incident, but no one cares.

I have not read the original post yet, because I have limited strength. I want to read it.

The informants trace back to COINTELPRO in the 60's / 70's. My story intersects with Marilyn Monroe and James Bond; it's in my docs.

I say a lot about the mental health system. You want to learn sooner than later about it. It is not what it appears to be.

Expand full comment
Oct 12, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

The only people who appear to have had the goal of attacking the Capitol on J6 were Ray Epps and the individual that Revolver News refers to as ā€œScaffold Commanderā€ (not to be confused with SimulationCommander).

Ray Epps was on video on January 5 with a bullhorn telling a crowd of Trump supporters that they had to go into the Capitol on J6. On J6, he is present at the first breach of bicycle racks set up for security and he appears in subsequent footage ramming the police with a big Trump sign.

His activities and the FBIā€™s lack of interest caught the attention of Revolver News, Tucker Carlson and Julie Kelly. However, the J6 Committee treated him - alone among those present at the Capitol, as unfairly maligned by conservative media. I read the transcript of his interview by the J6 Committee. They accept his excuses and even suggest explanations for his conduct, even a text message to his nephew in which he stated ā€œI orchestrated it.ā€ Ultimately, to silence conservative media, he was charged with one misdemeanor for disorderly conduct and given no jail time. Ray Epps wasnā€™t rousted out of bed by a team of armed agents pointing guns at him or held in pretrial detention. Heā€™s the only J6er to be profiled favorably in The NY Times.

My question is ā€œwho the fuck was he working for on J6 and what the fuck was he trying to do?ā€

Scaffold Commander was standing on a scaffold above the crowd on J6 exhorting the crowd to go into the Capitol. As far as I know, he has never been identified. I wonder why?

Finally, the only evidence that the Proud Boys had a plan to commit insurrection was a document called 1776 Returns, which was written by an FBI informant given To Enrique Tarrio shortly before J6. There is no evidence that he or any other member of the Proud Boys ever looked at it.

The only plot on J6 was a plot by some elements of our government to provoke a riot and blame ordinary Americans who supported Trump and believed with good reason that the election was stolen. They were exercising their rights and never expected to be the targets or pawns of a government operation. It is a black mark on our country.

Expand full comment

A timely column for me; at the weekly pub night my group of friends looked at me like I was crazy when I brought up that no policemen were murdered on Jan 6 (they thought three had died) and that some doors to the Capitol were opened by the Capitol Police (they thought all doors were broken down). They assumed FBI was embedded to simply monitor but not incite. Yes, some windows were broken and there was some vandalism and rioting, but for the most part it was the exact opposite of an ANTIFA demonstration. What shocked me is that I live in a conservative county in a conservative state and this is how deep the propaganda has taken root.

Expand full comment
Oct 12, 2023Ā·edited Oct 12, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

One question tells all.

Who benefited?

The Biden regime.

A congressional hearing allowing every state an opportunity to put into the record the irregularities in their presidential election, was stopped, never to be done.

Expand full comment
Oct 12, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

Well, here's my perspective on it. Milley and Pelosi definitely knew at least a couple days beforehand and chose to not allow the National Guard to protect the US Capitol.

https://unskool.substack.com/cp/137449423

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

I am in complete agreement with you on this, Brad, and your research as always is excellent. Now imagine that you're on someone's blog who sees the J6 as terrorists and believes everything the media has told them--that they killed a policeman and were trying to take Congress hostage and overthrow the gov't. It's someone you've read and respect for their thinking and research. But this is one narrative they're falling for without a single reservation. Would you try to change their mind? Or walk away?

I look at the links in your post on Israel-Hamas and they go to tweets, Fox, CNN, who are getting their news from the IDF--a neutral source. 'Babies on bayonets' has been used to start countless CIA wars, remember the incubators? The crying girl in the photo could just as well be Nadia, the daughter of the ambassador who lied about that to get us into Iraq, was it? So many lies, so many invasions. Who can keep track?

The same media that told you the truth about Covid and Ukraine, these are the ones you're believing now? You don't see anything wrong with how they got all that equipment in, breached the wall without any alarms being sounded? No larger agenda to that?

I say this only because I admire both you and SimComm so much. I posted this earlier, and I would love your thoughts on it: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/gaza-jailbreak-or-trap. It's such a small group that's been tracking the psyops so far, I hate to see it further divided.

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

Excellent material!

Expand full comment
founding

well, from our founding, the ground has always kept shifting and words keep being tuned into opposite meanings. those poor loyalists turned into enemies by nothing of their own doing.

or patriotism meaning not objecting when our people are sent into slaughter far far away.

you know, jon kerry is an idiot, mostly, but he wasn't wrong to turn against that war. smedley butler was appreciatively quoted in this comments section recently, but how many readers who liked those quotes had been mccain admirers? a guy who chuckles bomb bomb iran is no patriot in my view and especially considering what he viscerally knew of war.

how many older readers here have reviled liberals in the past for exposing the fbi?

if we're to fight all the bad things successfully, we need to really understand what the bad things are. we need to bring back the honor of the term "liberal." we need to do some real conserving, and a real lot of educating.

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2023Liked by Brad, SimulationCommander

We live not in a republic nor democracy, but a national security state: ā€œwhatā€™s known as the ā€œstate secrets privilege,ā€ a rule under which evidence must be excluded if its disclosure would pose a ā€œreasonable dangerā€ to national securityā€ This is exactly what every tyranny does: conceal itself and its doings from the people it claims to serve

Expand full comment