A few months ago it was a conspiracy to think that the CDC changed the definition of vaccine. And they still didn’t! But when they didn’t, they did it because of transparency. Honest!
Discussion about this post
No posts
A few months ago it was a conspiracy to think that the CDC changed the definition of vaccine. And they still didn’t! But when they didn’t, they did it because of transparency. Honest!
No posts
You know, I like their willingness to throw every other vaccine under the bus in order to preserve the narrative about covid vaccines. No vaccine is 100% effective. Breakthrough cases occur with every vaccine. All I can say is, don't blame the anti-vaxxers when people begin declining the measles or diptheria vaccines (efficacy: 97%). We're not the ones working overtime to convince them this is the same as all other vaccines, really, just the same, it's just that we misrepresented the way vaccines work in the past to make people overconfident about their efficacy!
On a positive note… well two cheers. Today, for the first time in what seems like forever, I heard a News bulletin that did not mention the word ‘Covid’ or any of the usual hyperbole about ‘cases’, etc. They did however manage to squeeze in a climate change related report about a train company launching first train service using batteries and diesel to ‘reduce carbon emissions’. More of The Science™️ on display - carbon is a sold byproduct if combustion = soot. Carbon dioxide is a gaseous byproduct of combustion. The two are not the same. These fools can’t even talk in whole molecules.