Another instance of people who claim that ‘democracy is under attack’ ignoring proper procedures and unilaterally making rules:
#6 is the worst part — it punts the definition of ‘up to date’ to the CDC. If the CDC wants future boosters, they will be mandated automatically.
A person is “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination when they have received all doses in the primary series and all boosters recommended for them by the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, when they become eligible.
This is an idea so dumb that only Jay Inslee would do it, and we haven’t even touched on how boosted people are more susceptible to covid than non-boosted……
Consider this a preview into the long-form article I’m working on that should drop over the weekend! It was just so shocking that I had to post it separately, I know we’ve got a lot of Washington natives here. 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️⛅⛅☀️⛅🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️
Yes I live in the kingdom of Inslee. State keeps degenerating and getting more expensive by the day. He has formed a coalition with Oregon and California. So by default we are ruled as a region run by Newsom. Very sad.
Since I've gathered over the years that the study and the debate of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights is a popular pastime and scholarly subject on par with how jews, orthodox christians and moslems study scripture (yes, really, to an outsider that is what it most resembles, especially when arguments get heated - the Varangian guard of Byzantium often had to stop monks and priests from rioting over interpretations of scripture after all) -
Would it be possibe for some one like this refugee from Innsmouth, Inslee, to either suspend elections due to a state of emergency (Covid) or to require proof of up-to-date injection to be allowed to vote?
I ask in earnest: if his bureaucrats comply with orders, and the National Guard, police and so on also comply with orders and the vote gets manipulated via state of emergency (trust me, even without reading the ctual regs, I know from experience that such regs are always written quite open-ended, to make the facts fit th needs of power): what could the federal governement then do if it, on its supra-state level was to decree the whole shenanigans invalid, even criminal?
Because I must say, the odds of a future administration ordering federal agents and forces to move in and disarm state forces loyal to Insell? Zip, zero and zilch.
Anyone care to just drop a line about this here, it would be much appreciated - many of us dissidents in the EUSSR still look to the US for inspiration, no matter how much we love to rib you; it's your leadership, not your citizenry we have a string distaste for.