60 Comments

Team Red = Nationalists; Team Blue = Socialists.

Nationalist + Socialist = ....

Expand full comment
Jun 2, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

There's nothing worse than hearing one of these politicians (or their mouthpieces in the so-called mainstream media) say, "We need more bipartisanship". When you hear that phrase, hang on to your hats, it *always* means they're about to do something horrible.

Expand full comment

You mean Hang on to your Wallet

Expand full comment

Do you mean one party in USA ? Or, globally😎✌

Expand full comment
author

Yes.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

Where's the Constitutional Political Party?

Expand full comment
author
Jun 1, 2023·edited Jun 1, 2023Author

≈1% in the polls? :)

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander
Jun 1, 2023·edited Jun 1, 2023

There was at least 1 rep. in the linked debate who opposed the bill (Chip Roy), but in the main debate, last night, it looks like no one spoke in opposition.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023·edited Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

The one that depressed me the most in this whole thing was Thomas Massie. Normally, I think he's pretty honest, and he may still well be, but he was also as dumb as the rest. He let it out of the rules committee because he said, "For once we got something for raising the debt ceiling." Well, Mr. Massie, here's what's wrong with that thinking. You're *always* supposed to "get something" for raising the debt ceiling. That "something" is supposed to be a re-evaluation of how much you're spending and on what. It's supposed to force a reckoning, not a bipartisan rolling of the taxpayer.

Expand full comment
author

Yeah I saw a dumb comment from him on Twitter and was very surprised.

Expand full comment

"Fucked" is what you got, Tom.

Expand full comment

Rand Paul may be the only Senator capable of independent thought. That must be why his attempt to run for POTUS in 2016 was doomed. The Uniparty has no understanding or interest in those who pay their exorbitant salaries and ridiculous retirement benefits. They have spent the USA into insolvency and the only question is whether Saudi Arabia, Russia, or China will control the world in the 21st century.

Expand full comment

Oh, Saudi Arabia, now that's an interesting, um, option.

Expand full comment

The world is like a giant poker game. Whoever ends up with the most money is the winner.

Expand full comment

Compulsory contrarian comment:

The goal of the game is to keep the game going and staying on top. That's winning in the game of power, politics and pecuniary matters.

Expand full comment

The antics of the RINOs and the Dems are reminiscent of the old 3 Stooges' movies. Just as the USA now stands for nothing but warfare and internecine battles, the most important thing is eternal warfare and conflict. My contrarian comment is GO PUTIN!!!!! Destroy the Nazis in Kiev and Washington, DC.

Expand full comment
author

And you'll never win as long as one guy has access to the chip printer..........

Expand full comment

And the Saudis can hide a lot of aces under those robes. (I'm sorry. I just couldn't resist. Your point is still well made.)

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

SC - Gridlock by design. They stall, nothing ever gets done, status quo, you lose, they win. Our whores on the hill have learned well from the masters... Since the end of World War II in 1945, Italy has had 69 governments, at an average of one every 1.11 years. Machiavelli is smiling.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

Well, Ron was mostly right. It’s the neocons who want to spend more on war, and they’re found in abundance in “both” parties (to the extent that you can believe that there’s any actual distinction).

Expand full comment
author

Yeah the neocons shifted to the Ds during the Trump years. (Running the show today is the Obama gang with more neocons!)

I said before the election that mainstream democrats haven't yet realized they're the party of endless war, endless printing, media censorship, "lockdown" corporations such as WalMart/Amazon, and the intelligence agencies -- but they're slowly coming around.

Expand full comment

SCOTUS approved 9-0 that FBI et. al. can look at our bank records even if it's to investigate someone else. Basically, Biden & Co. have taken away any right to privacy we had.

Expand full comment
author

"Government investigates government and determines government innocent."

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

At least the voting-figures are easy to find in the US.

Here, trying to find how an MP voted is nigh-on impossible, despite the information being public. The "dance-steps" you have to follow through the State's homepage are (I suspect) made purposefully complicated and impractical.

Anyway, despite having 8 parties in parliament they vote the same 90%+ of the time. In most issues, people do not agree with how the parties vote (if people understand the issue at all, most don't since they only know what's in the state/regime media).

The question to put to all politicians (I'd rather put /them/ to the question...) is:

If you believe in and endorse democracy - rule of the people - why do you not support rule by plebiscite?

Expand full comment
author

When they want to keep the votes hidden, they have a few tricks they can pull -- a "voice vote" being one of them. These people are proud of this vote, and that says a lot.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

When a two-year old has filled the potty without help getting on it, it's ok to be proud over a pile of shit.

Septuagenarian life-long politicians, not.

Once, we had anonymous voting in parliament. Before the 1950s, if the residing governement lost a vote in parliament, it had to resign.

Another "fun" fact: the number of civil servants, all kinds and levels, increased over 20 times from 1905 to 1980. The number of people employed by the state/local councils to actually do any work multiplied by 6 during that same time.

If you make an org chart of any western european nation's civil service or eq. it looks like a thumb-tack standing on its tip. I'm sure it's the same in the US.

And we the people(s) are under the thumb(tack)...

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

They do not fear us, and quite frankly I can see why.

Expand full comment

As I said, government, and government lite™. And it makes sense, what kind of politician goes into government and retains that intention of dismantling government?

Expand full comment
author

RON PAUL 2024!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Indeed. I wish I had been paying attention when he ran.

I was listening to RFK Jr. last night on a Dr. Drew podcast, and although he has good ideas, I still don't hear enough about what s he wants to take apart. And listen, if there is anyone who should have a vendetta against government overreach, it is a Kennedy.

Expand full comment

Until yesterday, I was a vocal supporter of RFK, Jr. And then I read his comments about how the USA must continue to support the Nazis in Ukraine.

#PAUL2024

Expand full comment
founding

I think he has plans for the CIA and FBI.

Expand full comment

Maybe he's afraid to speak on that this early, because of drawing true fire. 💣💥

Expand full comment

He's been pretty open stating that he holds CIA complicit in death of his father and uncle; he may be staying mum on any specific plan to rein them in however.

Expand full comment
founding

And they all congratulate each other for putting us all more in debt.

Expand full comment
author

"We came together to make the difficult decision to continue kicking the can down the road. You're welcome!"

Expand full comment
founding

And the Lobbies show their appreciation for a job well done with $$$ donations to the representatives re election campaigns…. This is really getting old.

Expand full comment

Yet, next cycle we'll all vote for 'change' by which we mean re-electing the incumbents.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

Welcome to the suspense hotline:

Please hold for last years response...

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by SimulationCommander

But but but it's the biggest spending cut in history...🙄

(after we made up an emergency and totally raised the spending bar)

He is such a swamp creature.

Expand full comment

I have yet to figure out, other than the complicity of lying media, how "only a modest increase" is able to be considered a "cut". If ever there is an actual honest reduction in a Federal budget, I'll be watching the skies for pigs, and Hell's schools will be having their first ever snow day.

Expand full comment
author

That's such a dumb talking point it might have come out of the mouth of KJP.

Expand full comment

🙌

Expand full comment

CONgress pretty much hates all Americans, doesn't it? If it was up to me, I'd clear out every last lobbyist. Then I'd audit every single congress critter yearly. They shouldn't be able to get as rich as Nancy Piglosi. While we're at it, I want a unicorn, too.

Expand full comment

"CONgress pretty much hates all Americans, doesn't it?"

The public is the enemy of the government. They realize it; most of us do not.

Expand full comment