You're totally right. The first round of emails was bad enough, because that's when we confirmed he was colluding with Peter D. to cover up the gain of function research. It's also when we found out Fauci was ignoring everything that didn't fit the narrative (like seasonality). This is how we know he's not just wrong, he's evil.
Nobody knows. Some one on another Substack recently related a story of a Zoom meeting they participated in. He made the comment, “Well, at least we aren’t in Australia.” He said that none of the libs in the group had a clue what was going on in that country. Libs limit themselves to a very small spectrum of information sources and thus know very little. Unless it is reported on CNN or The NY Times or similar, they don’t know. AND, they don’t want to know.
I had not seen this and it was actually worth clicking over to Twitter (sorry!) to do so.
Once again, I am seeing officials saying a certain point of view is too "dangerous" to entertain. That this is repeated time and again-- with urgent calls to suppress information and counter it in as many sources as possible-- shows a frightening pattern of willingness to truly endanger the American people in order to maintain the proper pandemic response. (Since the biggest and perhaps most successful "too dangerous to question" campaign has been the vaccines.)
Their idea of dialog is a "devastating published take down", and people who don't agree with you are "fringe", even if they include a Nobel Prize winner.
Yep. Same as those lab leak theorists, just loudly proclaim they are part of the out group and anybody who listens to them is automatically part of the out group as well. (And also racist!)
Twitter? Ah yes, that's what private browser windows are for. :)
Considering what we've previously seen of Fauci's e-mails from early in 2020, I can't say I'm at all surprised by this.
There are times when I wish I was a religious person and believed that God or Karma would deal with people like him in the end.
You're totally right. The first round of emails was bad enough, because that's when we confirmed he was colluding with Peter D. to cover up the gain of function research. It's also when we found out Fauci was ignoring everything that didn't fit the narrative (like seasonality). This is how we know he's not just wrong, he's evil.
What blows my mind is that he wasn't tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail shortly after the first round of e-mails became public.
Nobody knows. Some one on another Substack recently related a story of a Zoom meeting they participated in. He made the comment, “Well, at least we aren’t in Australia.” He said that none of the libs in the group had a clue what was going on in that country. Libs limit themselves to a very small spectrum of information sources and thus know very little. Unless it is reported on CNN or The NY Times or similar, they don’t know. AND, they don’t want to know.
I had not seen this and it was actually worth clicking over to Twitter (sorry!) to do so.
Once again, I am seeing officials saying a certain point of view is too "dangerous" to entertain. That this is repeated time and again-- with urgent calls to suppress information and counter it in as many sources as possible-- shows a frightening pattern of willingness to truly endanger the American people in order to maintain the proper pandemic response. (Since the biggest and perhaps most successful "too dangerous to question" campaign has been the vaccines.)
I just watched Jimmy Dore on YouTube cover this. I wish I could be surprised by the revelation.
Their idea of dialog is a "devastating published take down", and people who don't agree with you are "fringe", even if they include a Nobel Prize winner.
Yep. Same as those lab leak theorists, just loudly proclaim they are part of the out group and anybody who listens to them is automatically part of the out group as well. (And also racist!)
The whole world has turned Japanese.
It is hard to believe but no one is the antagonist in their own story. Especially these killers perhaps.