Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scuba Cat's avatar

Sick of being lectured by the people who caused the problem about how ordinary people and especially the poor are going to have to pay the price again. And so, they tell us, we need to learn to deal with it. Again.

Lillia Gajewski's avatar

I love the "no one said this would be fun" line. Makes you kind of want to punch the author for suggesting this is somehow all our fault. I find it interesting how we define "wealthy" situationally. When it comes to Obamacare, any couple making over $60,000 a year was too "wealthy" for help, regardless of the fact that a single person's insurance plan for those on the downside of middle age (heading into the "golden years") could be $1500 a month with a combined $12,000 deductible. However, for Bloomberg, anyone making under $300,000 is considered not wealthy enough to not be harmed by inflation. I suppose I should thank them for being honest (300K is more than most make but still not exorbitant in the current environment), but there's an insidious psychology here, though I'm not sure what the point is yet. That seemed a pretty randomly large number to be passing off as "just your average working Joe or Janet." (On a related note, thank you for putting a percentage on how many of us the "under $300K" actually applies to.)

96 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?