A quote from the second ruling, in Louisiana: "If human nature and history teach anything, it is that civil liberties face grave risks when governments proclaim indefinite states of emergency. During a pandemic such as this one, it is even more important to safeguard the separation
of powers set forth in our Constitution to avoid erosion of our liberties."
The court does not take notice that there are successful prophylactic and early treatment regimens, that is, it accepts the "Covid Scamdemic" story. I have noticed this in most of the legal discussions and the medical articles I have read, that there is no attempt to dispute "the narrative."
Maybe this is for the best, though. We want vaccine mandates to be illegal based on our Constitutional rights, and not because there are better treatment options. When the next bioweapon is released, I still want the freedom to say no to a chemical concoction, whether there are alternative treatments or not!
I've noticed that as well! They changed the definition of 'vaccine', but the chattering heads continue to pretend we're working off the 'old' definition -- the one that actually stopped transmission.
Great piece! Right now, my understanding is that just over 50% of the entire US population have been fully jabbed (2 shots+2 weeks). Is that correct? I ask because I'm wondering if anyone is tracking the actual number of those that are getting the third clot shot.
If it's taken almost a year to get to 50% of the original when people were told it would be the "official way out", I'd be curious to see what the trend is on the third. Not well I'm guessing but it would be enlightening to see those numbers.
Here are links to two rulings against Biden’s healthcare worker mandate, Monday and today: https://www.scribd.com/document/543329952/Missouri-v-Biden
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837.28.0.pdf
A quote from the second ruling, in Louisiana: "If human nature and history teach anything, it is that civil liberties face grave risks when governments proclaim indefinite states of emergency. During a pandemic such as this one, it is even more important to safeguard the separation
of powers set forth in our Constitution to avoid erosion of our liberties."
The court does not take notice that there are successful prophylactic and early treatment regimens, that is, it accepts the "Covid Scamdemic" story. I have noticed this in most of the legal discussions and the medical articles I have read, that there is no attempt to dispute "the narrative."
Maybe this is for the best, though. We want vaccine mandates to be illegal based on our Constitutional rights, and not because there are better treatment options. When the next bioweapon is released, I still want the freedom to say no to a chemical concoction, whether there are alternative treatments or not!
I've noticed that as well! They changed the definition of 'vaccine', but the chattering heads continue to pretend we're working off the 'old' definition -- the one that actually stopped transmission.
Great piece! Right now, my understanding is that just over 50% of the entire US population have been fully jabbed (2 shots+2 weeks). Is that correct? I ask because I'm wondering if anyone is tracking the actual number of those that are getting the third clot shot.
If it's taken almost a year to get to 50% of the original when people were told it would be the "official way out", I'd be curious to see what the trend is on the third. Not well I'm guessing but it would be enlightening to see those numbers.
You're correct that there's a huge dropoff after the first two shots.
The CDC states that the fully vaccinated are just under 60% of total population and 71% of the population over 18.
By contrast, only 20% of the FULLY VACCINATED (so 20% of the 60%) are 'boosted'.
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-onedose-pop-5yr
Thanks! I just saw that the UK is pushing to have everyone boosted every three months. Good luck!