The wacko leftists do not like government unless they are completely in charge of it. Really, should the taxpayer be funding the luscious lives of illegals who have done nothing to add to the prosperity of this country? Oh wait, they do add something and that is they might be spending all those grifted funds the taxpayer so lovingly has provided. All good...government is wonderful again.
Not quite as hot here at the moment, but local authorities have made a show all over the nation about resisting reporting illegals, or cancelling welfare et c for illegals.
Sadly, we have a limp-wristed dickless soycuck for a PM, and so he has said nothing, done nothing about it.
And there's plenty he could do: a kommun (our lowest level of government) refusing to carry out legal orders, from the state or state authority, can do so by asking a court to rule on the matter. In this case (illegals, and migrants with outstanding deportation orders) there's nothing to rule about because it is already settled case law and praxis.
Which means the Special Prosecutor (because obviously politicians violating the law in the execution of their duties, or the anti-execution in this case gets a special prosecutor) can simply charge them, summon them to court (special court too), and have the court sentence them to 4-6 years in prison which is what the book says is to be handed out.
But the PM won't order the prosecutor to do so. And the prosecutor, very aware that the next government will likely be a Red-Green-Feminist-moslem alliance, isn't risking her career for pesky things like the law.
Even more, most kommuner are recipients of state funding in addition to local taxes. The PM can via the cabinet ministers simply turn off the tap for the money. Anything from "auditing local expenditure over concers of mismanagement of funds" (no small amount of grift going here too, Somali-style) to simply cancelling funding of non-mandatory projects.
But he won't. Because he is a weak-minded silly little hand-puppet of the usual suspects.
Perhaps at this point, rather than threatening to backstab Denmark over Greenland, Trump could try to create a win/win-solution? Like this:
Offer a joint venture, mutually funded to the same extent, in establishing detention centers for refugees and illegals and criminals on the NE and NW of Greenland. EU and USA co-operating on this, and paying a percentage to the Greenlanders as a "thank you" and rent.
Since we're talking millions of people, at least initially, there'd be a logistical need for surveillance, security and so on, creating the perfect reason/excuse for installing systems that can monitor inmates as well as potential Chinese or Russian activity.
That's how you "win bigly", not by threatening allies.
(And: once word gets out that if you come to USA or EU the wrong way, you get an indefinite stay on the northern coast of Greenland, I'm thinking we'll see a drop-off of such by some 90% or more inside three years.)
Trump has Democrats cornered. He’ll keep raising the pressure knowing he’s in a win-win position. Democrats are screwed and know it, but they have to keep up appearances with their base. Trump will use their anti-ICE and pro-criminal illegal stance to define them for the midterms. There will be a stark choice for swing voters in November, and Democrats won’t like the results.
The Democrats/leftists appear to be very absorbed in their dramatic roles as Warrior Saviors and deliverers of Righteous Retribution. This is disturbing, because they do seem to be taking their role too seriously, to the point where they can't/don't want to rein in the action. Maybe this is a complication of having watched too many video games or created too many Tik Toks.
This is all about malcontent and malvontent educated upper class liberal chicks and their low-T feminized male lapdogs. They cannot maintain their upper class status competing in the private economy, so they end up looting and mooching from the soft money of the public sector. Trump is deconstructing their government and non-profit fraud industry, AI is deleting their bullshit administrative jobs, and Musk got corporations rolling purging the toxic woke. This is why they are trying to die by ramming their cars into law enforcement.
Indeed the ruling class and runner ups appear to be very malcontent and angry. I don't think they are planning to die, though, when they act out the way they do. I don't think they get it that they are in real life, where real people fight back against their abuses.
These "leaders" like Walz and Frey want anarchy, because they are either complicit in the fraud or completely retarded. Either way, I hope for their sake they experience pure, unadulterated anarchy. Those little bitches will run screaming for the police at the first real, visceral threat, and we will get a good laugh.
I do feel bad for the good people of Minnesota, though, because they are about to experience commies breaking society's eggs to make a worker's paradise omelet twice in a 5 year period.
I am STILL waiting for these self-righteous moral crusaders to stand up for my legal-immigrant, non-criminal wife, who lost her Green Card over asking USCIS a question. And that includes the loud-mouth congresswoman from my own state, Pramila Jayapal, who showed up in Minnesota to support the disgraced Walz for some insane reason. None of these people have any real integrity.
And if Frey can demand ICE leave in exchange for peace, can Red states do the same with their own bête noires like the IRS and EPA?
Core of the story: Wife moves to the US for marriage, and spends years on the process (waiting to work, doing paperwork, paying fees, etc.). Covid comes along and messes life up, so I (US-born citizen) take a job overseas. She remains in the US, though comes to spend time with me abroad. She gets a sudden meeting request with USCIS. I (foolishly) think we maybe can change it so she doesn't have to rush back. We call USCIS and ask if it's POSSIBLE to change the meeting. The guy at USCIS says, "hmm, maybe, let me check!" To emphasize, this just an informational call to their main phone number. A short time later we get a letter saying:
"USCIS scheduled you to appear for a naturalization interview on [date]; however, prior to the date of your interview, you requested to reschedule [no, we asked if it was POSSIBLE] your interview without any indication of when you would like be rescheduled. Since USCIS cannot hold applications pending adjudication for an unlimited amount of time, your request to reschedule has been denied and your Form N-400 application has been administratively closed."
That's it. Green Card lost over a question. We went on to fight it as best we could, but the key word there is "administratively"--legal immigrants do not get the "due process" illegals get via civil and criminal routes. You're just done.
"A prior convicted felon was charged in a criminal complaint today [Saturday] with being a felon in possession of a firearm and theft of government property after breaking into an FBI vehicle and stealing a rifle, announced United States Attorney Daniel N. Rosen."
I guess the officer driving it was taken to the hospital or something and it was left behind. They ransacked the paperwork and everything -- read it live on stream.
I have not read the underlying articles, but the headlines remind you of slave patrols and hunts for escaped slaves in the antebellum South. Vigilantism and citizen safety committees.
(I’m not at all thrilled about the DOJ opening this case, but OF COURSE Trump is going to go after these guys exactly how they went after him.)
Why don’t you support investigating them?
What is different, in a legal sense, between the conduct of Walz and Frey, when compared to the governor of Alabama during the 60s?
The difference is that the protesters organizing a march in George Wallace’ Alabama were not violent nor were they impeding law enforcement investigations.
Also, Wallace didn’t incite rebellion among the citizens of Alabama, against the National Guard, who were sent to restore order after he ordered state police to quash the civil rights march.
His actions did lead to the deaths and injuries now remembered as Bloody Sunday.
So, why shouldn’t Trump’s DOJ investigate politicians in Minnesota for politicizing standard federal deportation procedures to incite violence and unrest?
The bar they have to clear is so high I can't see how they could possibly get there. Investigating and failing is worse than not spending the resources on a failed attempt.
Of course, if anybody would write incriminating shit down, it's Walz.
Chris Bray's Substack post today talks about the impending crisis at a Minneapolis hospital that has run out of money and must find $50 million in the first quarter of 2026 to continue operating. The hospital spends plenty on their DEI initiatives and on "racism" which they believe is the biggest health crisis they face! The top of the article is about the runaway costs in the Los Angeles hospital system but the rest of the piece is about Minneapolis.
I am so sick of that phrase "DEI initiative"! I am still receiving harassing letters from a DEI officer at a company I contract with, reminding me that they "sent me a letter two years ago about our DEI initiative" and "strongly recommending" that I tell them about my skin color, ethnicity, sexual preference and physical and mental disabilities. People outside of Minneapolis, Portland, etc., keep talking about how DEI is passing away, but the DEI officers in my area are still pushing their "DEI initiative" down the throats of whomever is trying to do business with their corporation.
So I just flipped on the TV and the Movies! channel was showing "I Was A Communist for the F.B.I." Made in 1951. In one part, the commies were planning to call an illegitimate strike at a steel mill. (i.e. they called the strike, not the union bosses.) They were wrapping iron pipes in newspapers for concealment, and at the strike they started beating the union bosses who were trying to get the workers back to work. One communist woman in the crowd was not OK with this and was not cheering it on like the other comrades. A comrade next to her started yelling at her: "WHY AREN'T YOU SHOUTING?! WHY AREN'T YOU SHOUTING LIKE I AM?!"
Holy shit. Same exact thing on social media 75 years later.
The wacko leftists do not like government unless they are completely in charge of it. Really, should the taxpayer be funding the luscious lives of illegals who have done nothing to add to the prosperity of this country? Oh wait, they do add something and that is they might be spending all those grifted funds the taxpayer so lovingly has provided. All good...government is wonderful again.
Not quite as hot here at the moment, but local authorities have made a show all over the nation about resisting reporting illegals, or cancelling welfare et c for illegals.
Sadly, we have a limp-wristed dickless soycuck for a PM, and so he has said nothing, done nothing about it.
And there's plenty he could do: a kommun (our lowest level of government) refusing to carry out legal orders, from the state or state authority, can do so by asking a court to rule on the matter. In this case (illegals, and migrants with outstanding deportation orders) there's nothing to rule about because it is already settled case law and praxis.
Which means the Special Prosecutor (because obviously politicians violating the law in the execution of their duties, or the anti-execution in this case gets a special prosecutor) can simply charge them, summon them to court (special court too), and have the court sentence them to 4-6 years in prison which is what the book says is to be handed out.
But the PM won't order the prosecutor to do so. And the prosecutor, very aware that the next government will likely be a Red-Green-Feminist-moslem alliance, isn't risking her career for pesky things like the law.
Even more, most kommuner are recipients of state funding in addition to local taxes. The PM can via the cabinet ministers simply turn off the tap for the money. Anything from "auditing local expenditure over concers of mismanagement of funds" (no small amount of grift going here too, Somali-style) to simply cancelling funding of non-mandatory projects.
But he won't. Because he is a weak-minded silly little hand-puppet of the usual suspects.
Perhaps at this point, rather than threatening to backstab Denmark over Greenland, Trump could try to create a win/win-solution? Like this:
Offer a joint venture, mutually funded to the same extent, in establishing detention centers for refugees and illegals and criminals on the NE and NW of Greenland. EU and USA co-operating on this, and paying a percentage to the Greenlanders as a "thank you" and rent.
Since we're talking millions of people, at least initially, there'd be a logistical need for surveillance, security and so on, creating the perfect reason/excuse for installing systems that can monitor inmates as well as potential Chinese or Russian activity.
That's how you "win bigly", not by threatening allies.
(And: once word gets out that if you come to USA or EU the wrong way, you get an indefinite stay on the northern coast of Greenland, I'm thinking we'll see a drop-off of such by some 90% or more inside three years.)
Trump has Democrats cornered. He’ll keep raising the pressure knowing he’s in a win-win position. Democrats are screwed and know it, but they have to keep up appearances with their base. Trump will use their anti-ICE and pro-criminal illegal stance to define them for the midterms. There will be a stark choice for swing voters in November, and Democrats won’t like the results.
Of course it's the plan. It's been the plan from the get-go. They want to start a civil war to break America in two (or three or ten). Ordo ab chao.
The Democrats/leftists appear to be very absorbed in their dramatic roles as Warrior Saviors and deliverers of Righteous Retribution. This is disturbing, because they do seem to be taking their role too seriously, to the point where they can't/don't want to rein in the action. Maybe this is a complication of having watched too many video games or created too many Tik Toks.
The classic "social justice warrior" stance.
Nobody talking about Epstein lately, eh?
The "files" were a bunch of stuff we already knew, and a bunch of "document withheld for blah blah blah"
This is all about malcontent and malvontent educated upper class liberal chicks and their low-T feminized male lapdogs. They cannot maintain their upper class status competing in the private economy, so they end up looting and mooching from the soft money of the public sector. Trump is deconstructing their government and non-profit fraud industry, AI is deleting their bullshit administrative jobs, and Musk got corporations rolling purging the toxic woke. This is why they are trying to die by ramming their cars into law enforcement.
Indeed the ruling class and runner ups appear to be very malcontent and angry. I don't think they are planning to die, though, when they act out the way they do. I don't think they get it that they are in real life, where real people fight back against their abuses.
These "leaders" like Walz and Frey want anarchy, because they are either complicit in the fraud or completely retarded. Either way, I hope for their sake they experience pure, unadulterated anarchy. Those little bitches will run screaming for the police at the first real, visceral threat, and we will get a good laugh.
I do feel bad for the good people of Minnesota, though, because they are about to experience commies breaking society's eggs to make a worker's paradise omelet twice in a 5 year period.
"If you want to make an omelette, you've got to kill some people." - Lloyd Hansen, The Gray Man.
I am STILL waiting for these self-righteous moral crusaders to stand up for my legal-immigrant, non-criminal wife, who lost her Green Card over asking USCIS a question. And that includes the loud-mouth congresswoman from my own state, Pramila Jayapal, who showed up in Minnesota to support the disgraced Walz for some insane reason. None of these people have any real integrity.
And if Frey can demand ICE leave in exchange for peace, can Red states do the same with their own bête noires like the IRS and EPA?
What's the story behind losing the green card?
Core of the story: Wife moves to the US for marriage, and spends years on the process (waiting to work, doing paperwork, paying fees, etc.). Covid comes along and messes life up, so I (US-born citizen) take a job overseas. She remains in the US, though comes to spend time with me abroad. She gets a sudden meeting request with USCIS. I (foolishly) think we maybe can change it so she doesn't have to rush back. We call USCIS and ask if it's POSSIBLE to change the meeting. The guy at USCIS says, "hmm, maybe, let me check!" To emphasize, this just an informational call to their main phone number. A short time later we get a letter saying:
"USCIS scheduled you to appear for a naturalization interview on [date]; however, prior to the date of your interview, you requested to reschedule [no, we asked if it was POSSIBLE] your interview without any indication of when you would like be rescheduled. Since USCIS cannot hold applications pending adjudication for an unlimited amount of time, your request to reschedule has been denied and your Form N-400 application has been administratively closed."
That's it. Green Card lost over a question. We went on to fight it as best we could, but the key word there is "administratively"--legal immigrants do not get the "due process" illegals get via civil and criminal routes. You're just done.
….. so the wrong way was the right way ?!!! So sorry Zaruw
HOLY!
Does the Sortor video involve this?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/alleged-latin-kings-gang-member-arrested-federal-charges-after-stealing-rifle-fbi
"A prior convicted felon was charged in a criminal complaint today [Saturday] with being a felon in possession of a firearm and theft of government property after breaking into an FBI vehicle and stealing a rifle, announced United States Attorney Daniel N. Rosen."
That's the guy. They nabbed him the next day, I think.
Isn't it rather careless for a police/Ice car to be left parked outside at night with weapons etc. inside?
I guess the officer driving it was taken to the hospital or something and it was left behind. They ransacked the paperwork and everything -- read it live on stream.
I have not read the underlying articles, but the headlines remind you of slave patrols and hunts for escaped slaves in the antebellum South. Vigilantism and citizen safety committees.
(I’m not at all thrilled about the DOJ opening this case, but OF COURSE Trump is going to go after these guys exactly how they went after him.)
Why don’t you support investigating them?
What is different, in a legal sense, between the conduct of Walz and Frey, when compared to the governor of Alabama during the 60s?
The difference is that the protesters organizing a march in George Wallace’ Alabama were not violent nor were they impeding law enforcement investigations.
Also, Wallace didn’t incite rebellion among the citizens of Alabama, against the National Guard, who were sent to restore order after he ordered state police to quash the civil rights march.
His actions did lead to the deaths and injuries now remembered as Bloody Sunday.
So, why shouldn’t Trump’s DOJ investigate politicians in Minnesota for politicizing standard federal deportation procedures to incite violence and unrest?
The bar they have to clear is so high I can't see how they could possibly get there. Investigating and failing is worse than not spending the resources on a failed attempt.
Of course, if anybody would write incriminating shit down, it's Walz.
LOL!!
Chris Bray's Substack post today talks about the impending crisis at a Minneapolis hospital that has run out of money and must find $50 million in the first quarter of 2026 to continue operating. The hospital spends plenty on their DEI initiatives and on "racism" which they believe is the biggest health crisis they face! The top of the article is about the runaway costs in the Los Angeles hospital system but the rest of the piece is about Minneapolis.
https://chrisbray.substack.com/p/dont-you-dare-interrupt-our-collapse
I am so sick of that phrase "DEI initiative"! I am still receiving harassing letters from a DEI officer at a company I contract with, reminding me that they "sent me a letter two years ago about our DEI initiative" and "strongly recommending" that I tell them about my skin color, ethnicity, sexual preference and physical and mental disabilities. People outside of Minneapolis, Portland, etc., keep talking about how DEI is passing away, but the DEI officers in my area are still pushing their "DEI initiative" down the throats of whomever is trying to do business with their corporation.
These financial crises could explain a lot of the agitating against ICE.
Everybody should Chris Bray.
So I just flipped on the TV and the Movies! channel was showing "I Was A Communist for the F.B.I." Made in 1951. In one part, the commies were planning to call an illegitimate strike at a steel mill. (i.e. they called the strike, not the union bosses.) They were wrapping iron pipes in newspapers for concealment, and at the strike they started beating the union bosses who were trying to get the workers back to work. One communist woman in the crowd was not OK with this and was not cheering it on like the other comrades. A comrade next to her started yelling at her: "WHY AREN'T YOU SHOUTING?! WHY AREN'T YOU SHOUTING LIKE I AM?!"
Holy shit. Same exact thing on social media 75 years later.
Again
Why is it so important to prevent illegals from being deported?
In what way is that the concept these people are willing to tear your county apart over, the hill they want to die on?
Who does that except someone covering something up?
Illegals give them more representation in congress, and more money from the feds to operate "state programs."
And I'm sure there are a dozen other angles I haven't considered.
Real people don't want illegals here. Fake people (dumbocraps) have to be against the real people, because only fake people have rights.